MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1001/archsurg.1993.01420180025005

Медицинская библиотека · Archives of surgery (Chicago, Ill. : 1960) · 1993

The early experience with laparoscopic cholecystectomy in Oregon.

Deveney K E

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

To obtain a profile of laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) across the state of Oregon with regard to the safety of the procedure, use of intraoperative cholangiograms, and requirements for granting surgeons privileges to perform LC and other laparoscopic procedures.

DESIGN

Single-mailing survey to surgeons and chiefs of surgery in Oregon.

SETTING

The state of Oregon.

STUDY

PARTICIPANTS

Surgeons and chiefs of surgery in Oregon.

INTERVENTION: None.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Numbers of procedures performed, deaths, complications, and requirements for surgical privileges.

RESULTS

Sixty-nine percent of surgeons returned the questionnaire, as did 53% of the chiefs of surgery. Four deaths (0.04%), 244 complications (2.5%), and 27 bile duct injuries (0.28%) were reported in 9597 patients undergoing LC. Most surgeons (55%) obtained intraoperative cholangiograms routinely. Requirements for the privilege to perform LC varied among hospitals. Although the accuracy of this self-reported survey is uncertain, the results agree with those of other reports published to date.

CONCLUSION

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is being performed with acceptable safety, although the process of granting surgeons the privilege to perform this and other "new" laparoscopic procedures should be standardized according to established guidelines.

Для цитирования: Deveney K E. The early experience with laparoscopic cholecystectomy in Oregon.. Archives of surgery (Chicago, Ill. : 1960). 1993. DOI: 10.1001/archsurg.1993.01420180025005.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.