MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.ajem.2006.08.017

Медицинская библиотека · The American journal of emergency medicine · 2007

Splenic artery aneurysms encountered in the ED: 10 years' experience.

Liu Chu-Feng, Kung Chia-Te, Liu Ber-Ming, Ng Shu-Hang, Huang Chung-Cheng, Ko Sheung-Fat

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

Our objective was to report 7 cases of splenic artery aneurysm (SAA) encountered in the emergency department (ED).

METHODS

A retrospective survey of our ED database revealed 7 cases of SAA (6 men, 1 woman; mean age, 56 years) of 651,347 ED visits over the last decade. Their clinical and imaging features, management, and outcomes were evaluated.

RESULTS

Splenic artery aneurysm in the ED was rare (prevalence, 0.011%). Common presentations included acute abdomen (n = 5) and shock (n = 2). Five cases had liver cirrhosis and portal hypertension. Abdominal radiographs (n = 7) revealed 2 atherosclerotic patients with SAA. Abdominal computed tomography (n = 7) depicted all SAAs (size, 1.5-8 cm; mean, 3.8 cm). Four ruptured SAAs were successfully managed with coils embolization. Among them, 1 patient with ruptured mycotic SAA also received surgery, but the patient died of Klebsiella sepsis 3 months later.

CONCLUSIONS

In the ED, ruptured SAA should be included as a rare differential consideration of acute abdomen, especially in middle-aged men with liver cirrhosis and portal hypertension. Although SAA may be an unexpected computed tomographic finding, once diagnosed, endovascular treatment is recommended.

Для цитирования: Liu Chu-Feng, Kung Chia-Te, Liu Ber-Ming, Ng Shu-Hang, Huang Chung-Cheng, Ko Sheung-Fat. Splenic artery aneurysms encountered in the ED: 10 years' experience.. The American journal of emergency medicine. 2007. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajem.2006.08.017.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.