Systemic amyloidoses are caused by misfolding and aggregation of autologous proteins that deposit in tissues in the form of amyloid fibrils. 1 This process causes progressive organ dysfunction, eventually leading to organ failure and death if it is not arrested by effective therapy before advanced, irreversible organ damage has ensued. 2 To date, 36 different proteins have been recognized to form amyloid fibrils in vivo . 3 Involvement of the kidney can occur in several types of systemic amyloidosis ( Table 1 ); however, Ig light chain (AL) amyloidosis is by far the most common form, accounting for 87% of all patients diagnosed with renal amyloidosis at the Pavia Amyloidosis Research and Treatment Center in the past 30 years. The second most common form (9%) is amyloid A amyloidosis, reactive to chronic inflammation; however, its incidence is declining because of improvements in the treatment of chronic inflammatory diseases. 4 Other rarer types include the amyloidosis caused by Leukocyte Chemotactic Factor-2 (ALECT2), described in patients of Hispanic, Native-American, and Middle East origin, 5 and hereditary forms. Although some clinical features, such as the association of a monoclonal component, heart or soft tissue involvement, and albuminuria, can in some instances strongly suggest AL amyloidosis, there is often substantial overlap in the clinical presentation of different types of renal amyloidosis. 6 Thus, unequivocal typing of the amyloid deposits is mandatory before starting specific treatment. 7 Immunofluorescence on kidney biopsy has poor specificity, 8 and reliable techniques, such as immunohistochemistry with custom-made antibodies, 9 immuno-electron microscopy, 10 or mass spectrometry, 11 , 12 should be used in referring patients to specialized centers. DNA analysis is required to confirm hereditary forms. Table 1 Systemic amyloidosis involving the kidney Acquired Fibril protein Precursor protein Other organs AL Ig light chain All organs (except the brain) AH Ig heavy chain All organs (except the brain) AA Serum amyloid A Heart, liver, lung AApoAIV Uncertain Medulla and systemic ALECT2 Leukocyte chemotactic factor-2 Liver Aβ2-M β2-microglobulin, wild type Musculoskeletal system Hereditary Fibril protein Precursor protein Other organs AApoAI Apolipoprotein AI Liver, testis, heart, PNS AApoAII Apolipoprotein AII — AApoCIII Apolipoprotein ApoCIII — AFib Fibrinogen α — ALys Lysozyme — AGel Gelsolin Cranial nerves, cornea, skin ATTR Transthyretin PNS, ANS, heart, eye, leptomeningeal Aβ2-M β2-microglobulin, variant ANS, heart ANS, autonomous nervous system; PNS, peripheral nervous system. The amyloid types are identified by acronyms, where the letter “A” for amyloidosis is followed by the abbreviation of the protein forming the amyloid fibrils. Dashes indicate that no other major organ other than the kidney is involved.
Table 1
Systemic amyloidosis involving the kidney
ANS, autonomous nervous system; PNS, peripheral nervous system. The amyloid types are identified by acronyms, where the letter “A” for amyloidosis is followed by the abbreviation of the protein forming the amyloid fibrils. Dashes indicate that no other major organ other than the kidney is involved.
| Acquired | ||
| Fibril protein | Precursor protein | Other organs |
| AL | Ig light chain | All organs (except the brain) |
| AH | Ig heavy chain | All organs (except the brain) |
| AA | Serum amyloid A | Heart, liver, lung |
| AApoAIV | Uncertain | Medulla and systemic |
| ALECT2 | Leukocyte chemotactic factor-2 | Liver |
| Aβ2-M | β2-microglobulin, wild type | Musculoskeletal system |
| Hereditary | ||
| Fibril protein | Precursor protein | Other organs |
| AApoAI | Apolipoprotein AI | Liver, testis, heart, PNS |
| AApoAII | Apolipoprotein AII | — |
| AApoCIII | Apolipoprotein ApoCIII | — |
| AFib | Fibrinogen α | — |
| ALys | Lysozyme | — |
| AGel | Gelsolin | Cranial nerves, cornea, skin |
| ATTR | Transthyretin | PNS, ANS, heart, eye, leptomeningeal |
| Aβ2-M | β2-microglobulin, variant | ANS, heart |
The clinical features of AL amyloidosis with renal involvement have been recently reviewed. 13 This disease is caused by the deposition of monoclonal light chains produced by a plasma cell clone that, in 50% of patients, infiltrates the bone marrow by less than 10%, 14 and is the most common disorder among monoclonal gammopathies of renal significance. 15 , 16 Herrera and coworkers showed that kidney involvement starts with the formation of the amyloid deposits in the mesangium. 17 The light chain is internalized in the mesangial cell and delivered to the mature lysosomal compartment in which the fibrils are formed. 18 The amyloid deposits are then externalized and replace the mesangial matrix. Different independent studies found associations between light chain germline gene usage and organ involvement. 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 More recently, the Mayo Clinic investigators reported that LV6–57 gene usage is more common in AL amyloidosis than in normal B cells, and is associated with renal involvement. 24 This observation suggests that patients with LV6–57 monoclonal gammopathy should be screened for the onset of amyloid renal involvement.
In recent years, our understanding of the pathogenesis of AL amyloidosis and of the mechanisms of organ involvement in this disease has greatly improved, and major advances have been made in biomarker-based risk stratification and disease monitoring, and novel powerful drugs are expanding the therapeutic options. 25 Overall, these advances are resulting in improved outcomes. 26 Current treatment of AL amyloidosis is based on chemotherapy targeting the underlying plasma cell clone 25 ; however, novel approaches directly targeting the amyloid deposits are being developed. 27 In this review, we discuss the current approach to the treatment of AL amyloidosis and possible future developments.
Risk Stratification and Response Assessment
Amyloid kidney involvement is defined as a urinary protein excretion >0.5 g per 24 hours. 28 The urine protein should be predominantly albumin, to avoid confusion with patients who are excreting large amounts of Ig light chains but do not have glomerular involvement with amyloid. 28 Approximately 70% of patients with AL amyloidosis present with renal involvement. 29 Two-thirds to three-fourths of them have overt nephrotic syndrome at diagnosis, and one-half have some degree of renal failure, which is end-stage in 5% to 15% of cases. 29 , 30 Overall, the presence of kidney involvement is associated with longer survival, mainly because of a lower proportion of patients with cardiac amyloidosis ( Figure 1 ). Indeed, among patients with renal amyloidosis, those who also have involvement of the heart have a significantly poorer outcome, whereas almost 60% of patients without heart involvement are projected to survive more than 10 years ( Figure 2 ). The severity of heart dysfunction is best assessed by the cardiac biomarkers N-terminal pronatriuretic peptide type-B (NT-proBNP) and troponin. 31 , 32 A simple staging system based on these biomarkers can accurately stratify patients with AL amyloidosis and is applicable to subjects with renal involvement ( Figure 3 ). 33 , 34 In patients with renal failure, BNP should be preferred over NT-proBNP due to greater interference of reduced glomerular filtration rate in the metabolism of this marker. 35 Parameters of clonal disease also predict survival in AL amyloidosis. 36 The difference between involved (amyloidogenic) and uninvolved free light chains can be incorporated in the staging system based on cardiac biomarkers. 37 , 38 Recently, it has been shown that patients with low difference between involved (amyloidogenic) and uninvolved free light chain levels (<50 mg/l) have lower rates of heart involvement and higher rates of kidney involvement and a more favorable outcome. 39 , 40 Moreover, characteristics of the amyloidogenic plasma cell clone can predict different response to treatment and can be used in the design of the therapeutic strategy. 25 In particular, patients who harbor the cytogenetic abnormality gain 1q21 have a poorer outcome when treated with oral melphalan, whereas the translocation (11;14) is associated with lower response rates and survival in patients treated with bortezomib. 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 Figure 1 Survival of 1065 patients with light chain amyloidosis according to the presence of renal involvement ( P < 0.001). Green line: 702 patients with kidney involvement, median survival 51 months; the heart was involved in 70% of cases. Blue line: 363 patients without kidney involvement, median survival 15 months; the heart was involved in 90% of cases. Figure 2 Survival of 702 patients with renal light chain amyloidosis according to the presence of heart involvement ( P < 0.001). Blue line: 146 patients with kidney involvement without heart involvement, median survival not reached. Green line: 556 patients with kidney and heart involvement, median survival 31 months. Figure 3 Prognostic stratification of 702 patients with renal light chain amyloidosis according to the concentration of cardiac biomarkers ( P < 0.001). Green line: stage I, 146 patients, median survival not reached. Orange line: stage II, 307 patients, median survival 57 months. Red line: stage IIIa, 132 patients, median survival 20 months. Black line: stage IIIb, 117 patients, median survival 4 months. Staging is based on N-terminal pronatriuretic peptide type-B (NT-proBNP, cutoff 332 ng/l) and cardiac troponin I (cutoff 0.1 ng/ml). Stage I, II, and III patients have 0, 1, or 2 markers above the cutoff. In stage IIIb patients, NT-proBNP is >8500 ng/l.



Progression of renal dysfunction and risk of end-stage renal disease depend on levels of proteinuria and renal function at diagnosis. Patients who are diagnosed with renal AL amyloidosis at an early, asymptomatic stage, before nephrotic syndrome has ensued, have a significantly lower risk of requiring dialysis ( Figure 4 ). We have validated a staging system based on 24-hour proteinuria and estimated glomerular filtration rate that can accurately discriminate 3 groups with increasing risk of dialysis ( Figure 5 ). 45 Recently, Kastritis and coworkers 46 validated this staging system in an independent population and proposed the ratio of 24-hour proteinuria to estimated glomerular filtration rate as a sensitive marker of renal risk. Overall, these data indicate that renal AL amyloidosis can be diagnosed at an early reversible stage, when institution of specific treatment can prevent end-stage renal disease. Thus, we advocated screening with albuminuria of patients with monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance and abnormal circulating free light chain ratio, to allow presymptomatic identification of renal AL amyloidosis. 2 , 47 Figure 4 Progression to dialysis in 702 patients with renal involvement according to symptomatic state at presentation ( P < 0.001). Green line: 480 symptomatic patients with nephrotic syndrome and/or end-stage renal disease defined as estimated glomerular filtration rate <15 ml/min per 1.73 m 2 ; dialysis rate at 1, 2, and 5 years of 14%, 21%, and 28%, respectively. Blue line: 222 asymptomatic patients; dialysis rate at 1, 2, and 5 years of 4%, 4%, and 8%, respectively. Figure 5 Progression to dialysis in 702 patients with renal involvement according to the renal staging system ( P < 0.001). Blue line: stage I, 219 patients; dialysis rate at 1, 2, and 5 years of 1%, 1%, and 1%, respectively. Green line: stage II, 341 patients; dialysis rate at 1, 2, and 5 years of 8%, 13%, and 26%, respectively. Orange line: stage III, 142 patients; dialysis rate at 1, 2, and 5 years of 35%, 48%, and 53%, respectively.


Reducing the concentration of the circulating amyloidogenic light chain by targeting the plasma cell clone with chemotherapy consistently improves organ dysfunction and prolongs survival in AL amyloidosis, and major advances have been made in recent years. The criteria to assess hematologic response to treatment are based on the decrease of difference between involved (amyloidogenic) and uninvolved free light chain and disappearance of the monoclonal component at immunofixation of serum and urine, and can be used as early as 3 months after treatment initiation to identify patients with suboptimal response who should be shifted to second-line rescue therapy. 48 Clinical evidence exists that links cardiac dysfunction and NT-proBNP levels to the concentration of the circulating amyloidogenic light chain, 32 , 49 , 50 and changes in NT-proBNP concentration are used to assess cardiac response. 48 After chemotherapy, profound reductions in circulating amyloidogenic free light chains are also associated with better renal outcome, 30 whereas deep decreases in proteinuria predict prolonged patient survival. 51 We have validated a renal response criterion based on risk of progression to dialysis, defined as a decrease in proteinuria by at least 30% or drop below 0.5 g per 24 hours, in the absence of renal progression defined as a >25% decrease in estimated glomerular filtration rate. 45 Current validated hematologic and organ response criteria in AL amyloidosis are reported in Table 2 . Table 2 Validated criteria for response assessment in light chain amyloidosis Response criteria Definition Hematologic response Complete response Negative serum and urine immunofixation and normal FLC ratio Very good partial response dFLC <40 mg/L Partial response dFLC decrease >50% compared to baseline No response All other patients Patients with dFLC <50 mg/l Complete response Negative serum and urine immunofixation and normal FLC ratio Low-dFLC-response dFLC <10 mg/l Cardiac response Decrease of NT-proBNP by >30% and 300 ng/l (if baseline NT-proBNP >650 ng/l), or at least a 2-point decrease of NYHA class (if baseline NYHA class is III or IV) Renal response At least 30% decrease in proteinuria or drop below 0.5 g/24 h, in the absence of renal progression defined as a >25% decrease in eGFR CR, complete response; dFLC, difference between involved and uninvolved light chain; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; FLC, free light chain; NT-proBNP, N-terminal pronatriuretic peptide type-B; NYHA, New York Heart Association. Response criteria are validated in independent patient populations for use at 3 and 6 months after treatment initiation.
Table 2
Validated criteria for response assessment in light chain amyloidosis
CR, complete response; dFLC, difference between involved and uninvolved light chain; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; FLC, free light chain; NT-proBNP, N-terminal pronatriuretic peptide type-B; NYHA, New York Heart Association. Response criteria are validated in independent patient populations for use at 3 and 6 months after treatment initiation.
| Response criteria | Definition |
| Hematologic response | |
| Complete response | Negative serum and urine immunofixation and normal FLC ratio |
| Very good partial response | dFLC <40 mg/L |
| Partial response | dFLC decrease >50% compared to baseline |
| No response | All other patients |
| Patients with dFLC <50 mg/l | |
| Complete response | Negative serum and urine immunofixation and normal FLC ratio |
| Low-dFLC-response | dFLC <10 mg/l |
| Cardiac response | Decrease of NT-proBNP by >30% and 300 ng/l (if baseline NT-proBNP >650 ng/l), or at least a 2-point decrease of NYHA class (if baseline NYHA class is III or IV) |
| Renal response | At least 30% decrease in proteinuria or drop below 0.5 g/24 h, in the absence of renal progression defined as a >25% decrease in eGFR |
Targeting the Amyloidogenic Plasma Cell Clone
The possibility of effectively reducing the production of the precursor protein with chemotherapy makes AL amyloidosis a treatable type of renal amyloidosis. The therapeutic approaches targeting the amyloidogenic plasma cell are usually borrowed from multiple myeloma; however, patients with AL amyloidosis not only have a hematologic malignancy, but their multiorgan involvement makes them particularly fragile and susceptible to treatment toxicity. Thus, the treatment of patients with AL amyloidosis should be risk-adapted. 25 To date, no randomized clinical trials of modern treatment approaches have been published, and there is little evidence in support of a standard treatment strategy in AL amyloidosis. Thus, whenever possible, patients should be referred to specialized centers for treatment and inclusion in clinical trials.
Treatment for Low-Risk Patients
Low-risk patients represent approximately 15% to 20% of all subjects with renal AL amyloidosis and are candidates for autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). This procedure is associated with a substantially higher risk of early mortality in AL amyloidosis compared with multiple myeloma. However, careful patient selection and a critical level of expertise reduce the risk to an acceptable level. The great majority of transplant-related mortality occurs in patients with elevated cardiac biomarkers, and subjects whose NT-proBNP is >5000 ng/l and/or cardiac troponin T is >0.06 ng/ml are not suitable candidates for ASCT. 52 , 53 Other criteria defining eligibility for ASCT are age <65 years, performance status (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group) 0 to 2, estimated glomerular filtration rate >50 ml/min per 1.73 m 2 unless on dialysis, New York Heart Association class <III, cardiac ejection fraction >45%, systolic blood pressure >90 mm Hg (standing), and lung CO diffusion capacity >50%. 25 Similar criteria are used at all major referral centers. 53 , 54 Refinement in selection criteria has reduced transplant-related mortality over time. 55 Accumulation of a critical level of experience in transplanting patients with AL amyloidosis also is crucial, the outcome being significantly poorer at centers where fewer than 4 transplants per year are performed in patients with this disease. 55 When adequate selection of transplant candidates is applied at referral centers, the outcome of patients with AL amyloidosis undergoing ASCT is excellent, with hematologic response in 71% of subjects and complete response (CR) in 35% to 37%. 55 , 56 This results in an overall median survival of 7.6 years, with 55% of patients in CR surviving more than 14 years. 56 Renal response rate to ASCT is 32%. 55 Patients who fail to reach CR after ASCT can receive “adjuvant” bortezomib-based treatment, increasing the CR rate to almost 60%. 57 Bortezomib can be used as induction therapy before ASCT, and this approach increases the response rate and quality of response, particularly in patients with a bone marrow plasma cell infiltrate >10%. 58 Acute kidney injury can frequently occur in patients with AL amyloidosis who have other features associated with engraftment syndrome in the setting of ASCT. 59 This syndrome is characterized by rash, fever, weight gain, diarrhea, and noncardiogenic pulmonary edema within days of leukocyte engraftment. Other causes of acute kidney injury around the time of engraftment, particularly infection, need to be excluded. In this setting, steroid therapy should be initiated as soon as possible. 59 Nevertheless, the recent HOVON 104 trial of induction with bortezomib/dexamethasone before ASCT, showed a CR rate of only 30% 6 months after ASCT, and a high proportion (24%, 8% due to bortezomib toxicity) of patients who could not proceed to ASCT. 60 However, in this study, a very intensive induction treatment (bortezomib 1.3 mg/m 2 twice weekly and dexamethasone 20 mg 4 times per week) was used that can at least in part account for the high dropout rate. At our center, we offer upfront treatment with cyclophosphamide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone (CyBorD) to all transplant candidates, unless they present contraindications to bortezomib, and we proceed to ASCT in case a CR is not reached with CyBorD alone. Overall, at our center, 8% of all patients with renal AL amyloidosis (corresponding to 50% of low-risk subjects) receive ASCT upfront or after induction.
Treatment for Intermediate-Risk Patients
Intermediate-risk patients account for approximately 65% of patients with renal AL amyloidosis. They receive nontransplant chemotherapy. Until recently, a standard treatment for these patients has been oral melphalan/dexamethasone (MDex). 61 , 62 This regimen is very well tolerated and yields a 76% overall hematologic response rate, with CR in 31% of cases and renal response in 24%. 38 One of the few randomized trials completed in AL amyloidosis compared MDex with ASCT and failed to demonstrate an advantage for ASCT in terms of response rate and survival. 63 This trial was performed before the availability of biomarker-based selection of transplant candidates, and the results were considered influenced by a very high transplant-related mortality. Nevertheless, a landmark analysis excluding early deaths confirmed these results. The availability of the proteasome inhibitor bortezomib was enthusiastically welcome, because the amyloidogenic plasma cell used the proteasome to cope with the toxicity generated by the plasma cells they produce. 64 Indeed, we have recently shown that amyloidogenic light chains are intrinsic stressors for plasma cells and increase their sensitivity to proteasome inhibition. 65 A large European retrospective study and a prospective trial showed promising efficacy of bortezomib in relapsed and refractory patients. 66 , 67 , 68 , 69 Subsequently, 2 small retrospective series showed unprecedented response rates with the CyBorD combination upfront. 70 , 71 In the largest study of frontline treatment with CyBorD of patients with AL amyloidosis, the overall hematologic response rate was 60%, with CR in 23% of cases and renal response in 25%. 72 Two retrospective case-control studies showed a higher response rate with bortezomib in combination with alkylating agents and dexamethasone compared with the previous standards of care with MDex and cyclophosphamide/thalidomide/dexamethasone, although without a survival benefit. 73 , 74 An international phase III study ( NCT01277016 ) comparing MDex with bortezomib plus MDex has recently been completed, showing a significantly higher overall hematologic response rate with bortezomib plus MDex (81% vs. 57%, P = 0.005), with longer time to second-line therapy or death and comparable rates of CR (23% vs. 20%) and of renal response (44% with both regimens). 75 Based on these data, bortezomib should be offered to intermediate-risk patients, in the absence of contraindications such as peripheral neuropathy. The choice of the best combination should take into account clonal and patient characteristics. A recent study by Kastritis et al. 76 showed that addition of cyclophosphamide and higher doses of dexamethasone do not improve outcomes of patients with AL amyloidosis treated with bortezomib. Treatment with bortezomib plus MDex has the advantage of overcoming the effects of both gain 1q21 (poor outcome with oral melphalan) and t(11;14) (poor outcome with bortezomib). 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 Treatment with CyBorD or bortezomib/dexamethasone alone is preferred in patients with potentially reversible contraindication to ASCT, being stem cell sparing, as well as in subjects with renal failure.
Treatment for High-Risk Patients
The remaining 15% to 20% of patients with renal AL amyloidosis are high-risk, most frequently because of advanced cardiac stage (IIIb) or severe heart failure (New York Heart Association class III or IV). So far, no treatment approach, including those based on bortezomib, was able to overcome the poor prognosis of these patients, and median survival ranges from 3 to 7 months. 77 Nevertheless, the few patients who survive long enough (at least 3 months) to take advantage of response to chemotherapy survive significantly longer. 72 High-risk patients are treated with low-dose combinations, with weekly dose escalation based on tolerability under intensive monitoring. 25
Treatment for Relapsed/Refractory Disease
Relapsed patients can be treated by repeating upfront therapy, if possible, although this is associated with shorter time to retreatment without reduction in overall survival. 78 Lenalidomide can be used in refractory patients, being able to overcome resistance to alkylating agents, proteasome inhibitors, and thalidomide. 79 , 80 , 81 , 82 , 83 , 84 However, use of lenalidomide is associated with worsening renal failure in patients with renal AL amyloidosis with nephrotic syndrome. 85 Lenalidomide combinations have been also used upfront with encouraging results. 82 , 83 , 86 , 87 , 88 , 89 Pomalidomide also is a very effective agent in refractory AL amyloidosis, being able to rescue patients exposed to other classes of drugs including alkylators, first- and second-generation proteasome inhibitors, and lenalidomide. 90 , 91 , 92 Hematologic response to pomalidomide is rapid (median 1 month) and is observed in up to two-thirds of patients in the refractory setting, with renal response in 17% of cases. 92 Newer agents have proven effective in relapsed/refractory patients, and are being considered for novel upfront combinations. The proteasome inhibitor carfilzomib has been tested in a trial in previously treated patients with AL amyloidosis. The hematologic response rate was 63% (CR 12%), and renal response was observed. 93 In this study, 39% of patients had NT-proBNP progression, which was clinically relevant in 18% of cases, and cardiac toxicity of carfilzomib will probably limit the role of this drug in AL amyloidosis. A trial of carfilzomib in combination with thalidomide and dexamethasone is ongoing ( NCT02545907 ). The oral proteasome inhibitor ixazomib was particularly active in bortezomib-naïve patients, 94 and is currently being tested in a randomized phase III trial ( NCT01659658 ). Two trials of this agent in combination with cyclophosphamide and dexamethasone ( NCT03236792 , NCT01864018 ) are ongoing in the upfront setting. Daratumumab is also a very promising drug in AL amyloidosis. A recently published series showed a 76% hematologic response rate with 36% CRs in a median time of 1 month. 95 Two phase II trials of daratumumab in relapsed/refractory patients are under way ( NCT02841033 , NCT02816476 ) and a phase III randomized trial of daratumumab in combination with CyBorD versus CyBorD alone in newly diagnosed patients is about to begin ( NCT03201965 ). The list of ongoing clinical trial for AL amyloidosis is reported in Tables 3 and 4 . Table 3 Ongoing clinical trials in light chain amyloidosis, chemotherapeutic approaches Newly diagnosed patients Trial Number Phase Regimen NCT03236792 I/II Ixazomib, cyclophosphamide, and dexamethasone NCT01864018 I/II Ixazomib, cyclophosphamide, and dexamethasone NCT01807286 I/II Pomalidomide, melphalan, and dexamethasone NCT03201965 III Daratumumab with cyclophosphamide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone versus cyclophosphamide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone alone Relapsed/refractory patients NCT01659658 III Ixazomib plus dexamethasone versus physician’s best choice NCT02545907 Ib Carfilzomib, thalidomide, and dexamethasone NCT02841033 I/II Daratumumab (single agent) NCT02816476 II Daratumumab (single agent) NCT03000660 I Venetoclax and dexamethasone Table 4 Ongoing clinical trials in light chain amyloidosis, nonchemotherapeutic approaches Newly diagnosed patients Trial Number Phase Regimen NCT02312206 III NEOD001/bortezomib-based regimen versus placebo/bortezomib-based regimen Relapsed/refractory patients NCT03044353 II GSK2398852 administered following and along with GSK2315698 NCT02245867 Ia/Ib Chimeric fibril-reactive monoclonal antibody 11–1F4 NCT02632786 IIb NEO001 (single agent) versus placebo (patients with heart involvement) NCT03168906 IIb NEO001 (single agent) versus placebo (patients with kidney involvement)
Table 3
Ongoing clinical trials in light chain amyloidosis, chemotherapeutic approaches
| Newly diagnosed patients | ||
| Trial Number | Phase | Regimen |
| NCT03236792 | I/II | Ixazomib, cyclophosphamide, and dexamethasone |
| NCT01864018 | I/II | Ixazomib, cyclophosphamide, and dexamethasone |
| NCT01807286 | I/II | Pomalidomide, melphalan, and dexamethasone |
| NCT03201965 | III | Daratumumab with cyclophosphamide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone versus cyclophosphamide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone alone |
| Relapsed/refractory patients | ||
| NCT01659658 | III | Ixazomib plus dexamethasone versus physician’s best choice |
| NCT02545907 | Ib | Carfilzomib, thalidomide, and dexamethasone |
| NCT02841033 | I/II | Daratumumab (single agent) |
| NCT02816476 | II | Daratumumab (single agent) |
| NCT03000660 | I | Venetoclax and dexamethasone |
Table 4
Ongoing clinical trials in light chain amyloidosis, nonchemotherapeutic approaches
| Newly diagnosed patients | ||
| Trial Number | Phase | Regimen |
| NCT02312206 | III | NEOD001/bortezomib-based regimen versus placebo/bortezomib-based regimen |
| Relapsed/refractory patients | ||
| NCT03044353 | II | GSK2398852 administered following and along with GSK2315698 |
| NCT02245867 | Ia/Ib | Chimeric fibril-reactive monoclonal antibody 11–1F4 |
| NCT02632786 | IIb | NEO001 (single agent) versus placebo (patients with heart involvement) |
| NCT03168906 | IIb | NEO001 (single agent) versus placebo (patients with kidney involvement) |
Targeting the Amyloid Deposits and Interfering With Amyloidogenesis and Organ Damage
New therapeutic approaches specifically targeting the amyloid deposits or interfering with amyloid formation and organ targeting are emerging as a possible complement of chemotherapy, given in combination with anti–plasma cell therapy or after achievement of hematologic response.
Treatments Interfering the Amyloid Formation
Our observation that the anthracycline 4′-iodo-4′-deoxy-doxorubicin inhibited amyloidogenesis in vitro and could induce clinical improvement in patients with AL amyloidosis, prompted the investigation of related noncytotoxic compounds. 96 , 97 , 98 , 99 , 100 Among them, the antibiotic doxycycline proved able to disrupt the amyloid fibrils in transgenic mouse models of transthyretin and AL amyloidosis. 101 , 102 Moreover, doxycycline can interfere with light chain–induced toxicity in a Caenorhabditis elegans model, in which exposure to amyloidogenic light chains from patients with cardiac AL amyloidosis results in the reduction of the pumping function of the nematode’s pharynx, which resembles the vertebrate heart. 103 A recent retrospective case-control study showed that patients with cardiac AL amyloidosis who received doxycycline together with chemotherapy had a reduction in early mortality, translating into higher response rates and prolonged survival. 104 A prospective, international, randomized trial of chemotherapy with or without doxycycline is being designed. In the C. elegans model, the toxicity of amyloid light chains appeared to be dependent on metal ions and was prevented by metal chelators synergistically with doxycycline, paving the way to future clinical studies on this combination. 105
Polyphenols are also being investigated as inhibitors of fibril formation by redirecting amyloidogenic polypeptides into unstructured, off-pathway oligomers. 106 Among them is epigallocatechin-3-gallate. 107 Case reports and retrospective series showed promising activity of epigallocatechin-3-gallate on cardiac AL amyloidosis. 108 , 109 In a phase II trial, epigallocatechin-3-gallate was well tolerated, and in some patients a decrease in albuminuria was observed. 110 Other trials of this compound in AL amyloidosis are under way ( NCT01511263 , NCT02015312 ).
Treatments Targeting the Amyloid Deposits
The London group developed a palindromic compound CPHPC that is a competitive inhibitor of the binding of serum amyloid P component (SAP) to amyloid fibrils, which protects them from degradation, and is able to remove SAP from the bloodstream. 111 Subsequently, they showed that administration of anti-human-SAP antibodies to mice with amyloid deposits containing human SAP triggers a complement-dependent, macrophage-derived giant cell reaction that removes visceral amyloid deposits, 112 and proposed a combination approach based on CPHPC and anti-SAP antibodies. A pilot clinical study of this approach showed encouraging results, 113 and a clinical trial in patients with AL amyloidosis who undergo or have completed chemotherapy is ongoing ( NCT03044353 ). Future trials based on validated organ response criteria are eagerly awaited.
A different immunotherapy approach has been explored by Hrncic et al. , 114 who showed that infusion of an anti–light chain monoclonal antibody specific for an amyloid-related epitope led to the resolution of amyloidomas generated in mice by injection of amyloid proteins extracted from the spleens or livers of patients with AL amyloidosis. A phase I study of this antibody (11–1F4) is ongoing. An interim analysis presented at the last American Society of Hematology annual meeting (December 2016), showed organ response, including reduction of proteinuria, in 5 of 8 patients with measurable disease. 115 In the phase Ib study, 5 of 6 patients who completed the follow-up showed organ response. In addition, no grade 3 and 4 adverse events related to the drug were reported.
Currently, the immunotherapy targeting amyloid deposits in the most advanced stage of clinical development is based on NEOD001, a monoclonal antibody that binds to amyloid protofilaments and fibrils. The murine form of this antibody, 2A4, binds soluble and insoluble light chain aggregates from patients with AL amyloidosis and promotes clearance of amyloid deposits by phagocytosis. 116 In a phase I/II study on patients with AL amyloidosis who had completed chemotherapy and had persisting organ dysfunction, cardiac and renal response rates were 57% and 60%, respectively. 117 The results of this study were recently updated, showing that organ response to NEOD001 was independent of rate and depth of previous hematologic response. 118 A phase II randomized, placebo-controlled trial to evaluate renal response rate in patients with AL amyloidosis who have a maintained hematologic response to chemotherapy is under way ( NCT03168906 ), and 2 phase III randomized, placebo-controlled trials of NEOD001 combined with bortezomib-based chemotherapy in newly diagnosed patients ( NCT02312206 ), and as a single agent in subjects who completed chemotherapy ( NCT02632786 ) have recently completed enrollment and results are eagerly awaited.
Supportive Therapy
Supportive treatment is vital in patients with AL amyloidosis to sustain organ function while chemotherapy takes effect, and to improve quality of life. Patients with renal amyloidosis present nephrotic syndrome and volume overload that are frequently associated with severe hypotension, in particular if the heart and/or autonomic nervous system are involved. Other consequences of the urinary protein loss include hyperlipidemia, increased risk of deep venous thrombosis, and malnutrition. We reported that nutritional status independently affects quality-of-life assessment in patients with AL amyloidosis. 119 , 120 , 121 The results of an interventional study run at our center documented that in outpatients with AL amyloidosis, nutritional counseling was helpful in preserving body weight, effective in improving mental quality of life, and associated with better survival. 122
The combination of urinary protein loss and increased catabolic rate play a central role in the constitution of hypoalbuminemia. 123 The development of a significant peripheral edema requires diuretics associated with dietary sodium restriction. Patients should be frequently consulted on a low-salt diet and they should weigh themselves daily, and diuretic dosing should be titrated accordingly. Thiazide diuretics have less of a natriuretic effect than the loop diuretics, but are sometimes used in conjunction with them to increase natriuresis. Metolazone could be considered in patients with or without renal failure, with careful monitoring for possible hypotension. 124 Spironolactone may be useful for its action as a potassium-sparing diuretic and owing to its antiproteinuric affect. Patients with severe nephrotic syndrome may benefit from admission for i.v. diuretics, and albumin infusions could be considered. In some patients, asymptomatic involvement of the autonomic nervous system 125 could lead to overt, often severe hypotension when treatment with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors is established. This therapy should be considered with caution and at the lowest effective dose. The presence of severe nephrotic syndrome can also increase the risk of venous thrombosis. This association has been attributed to an imbalance between prothrombotic and procoagulant factors, as well as antithrombotic and anticoagulant factors, that promotes thrombosis in deep veins. Anticoagulation should be considered in patients who have other procoagulant factors, most commonly treatment with immunomodulatory drugs. Patients who develop end-stage renal disease could initiate renal replacement therapy. However, patients with amyloidosis are prone to intradialytic hypotension due to cardiac and autonomic nervous system involvement, as well as the severe nephrotic syndrome that decreases capillary refill rates. Thus, ultrafiltration may be difficult to effectively perform. These patients may benefit from more frequent dialysis treatments to attenuate the ultrafiltration rate during each individual session. The median survival of patients with AL amyloidosis exceeds 3 years from dialysis initiation. 30 , 45 Renal transplantation can be offered to patients who achieve CR after chemotherapy, who are at lowest risk of recurrence of amyloidosis in the graft. 25
In conclusion, chemotherapy reducing the supply of the toxic light chain is the backbone of treatment of AL amyloidosis. Regimens increasing the rate and depth of hematologic response significantly improved the outcome of patients with this disease in the past few years. 26 , 126 The development of newer, even more powerful anti–plasma cell agents, such as pomalidomide and daratumumab, which will soon be tested in clinical trials in combination with established regimens, will most likely further improve the outlook of patients with AL amyloidosis. However, many patients are still diagnosed when advanced organ damage has already established, and early diagnosis, at a presymptomatic stage, based on screening of patients at risk with sensitive biomarkers remains critical to improve survival in this disease. Several strategies are being developed to interfere with the amyloidogenic process and target the amyloid deposits in combination with chemotherapy or after hematologic response has been reached. If this approach succeeds, in the near future anti–plasma cell and antiamyloid drugs will be combined upfront, and the latter continued until a satisfactory organ response is achieved, potentially further improving survival and quality of life of patients with AL amyloidosis. Finally, the improvement in the understanding of the molecular mechanisms of amyloidogenesis and organ damage will unveil novel potential treatment targets, moving toward a cure for this dreadful disease.
Disclosure
GP received honoraria from Jannsen-Cilag, honoraria and travel support from Prothena, and travel support from Celgene. GM is a consultant for Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Pfizer, Janssen, Prothena, and IONIS. The other author declared no competing interests.
References
1 Merlini G. Bellotti V. Molecular mechanisms of amyloidosis N Engl J Med 349 2003 583 596 12904524 10.1056/NEJMra023144
2 Merlini G. Wechalekar A.D. Palladini G. Systemic light chain amyloidosis: an update for treating physicians Blood 121 2013 5124 5130 23670179 10.1182/blood-2013-01-453001
3 Sipe J.D. Benson M.D. Buxbaum J.N. Amyloid fibril proteins and amyloidosis: chemical identification and clinical classification International Society of Amyloidosis 2016 Nomenclature Guidelines Amyloid 23 2016 209 213 27884064 10.1080/13506129.2016.1257986
4 Obici L. Merlini G. AA amyloidosis: basic knowledge, unmet needs and future treatments Swiss Med Wkly 142 2012 w13580 22653707 10.4414/smw.2012.13580
5 Said S.M. Sethi S. Valeri A.M. Characterization and outcomes of renal leukocyte chemotactic factor 2-associated amyloidosis Kidney Int 86 2014 370 377 24451324 10.1038/ki.2013.558
6 Palladini G. Merlini G. Systemic amyloidoses: what an internist should know Eur J Intern Med 24 2013 729 739 24262289 10.1016/j.ejim.2013.10.007
7 Lachmann H. Booth D. Booth S. Misdiagnosis of hereditary amyloidosis as AL (primary) amyloidosis N Engl J Med 346 2002 1786 1791 12050338 10.1056/NEJMoa013354
8 Satoskar A. Burdge K. Cowden D. Typing of amyloidosis in renal biopsies: diagnostic pitfalls Arch Pathol Lab Med 131 2007 917 922 17550319 10.5858/2007-131-917-TOAIRB
9 Schönland S.O. Hegenbart U. Bochtler T. Immunohistochemistry in the classification of systemic forms of amyloidosis: a systematic investigation of 117 patients Blood 119 2012 488 493 22106346 10.1182/blood-2011-06-358507
10 Fernandez de Larrea C. Verga L. Morbini P. A practical approach to the diagnosis of systemic amyloidoses Blood 125 2015 2239 2244 25636337 10.1182/blood-2014-11-609883
11 Vrana J. Gamez J. Madden B. Classification of amyloidosis by laser microdissection and mass spectrometry-based proteomic analysis in clinical biopsy specimens Blood 114 2009 4957 4959 19797517 10.1182/blood-2009-07-230722
12 Brambilla F. Lavatelli F. Di Silvestre D. Reliable typing of systemic amyloidoses through proteomic analysis of subcutaneous adipose tissue Blood 119 2012 1844 1847 21917755 10.1182/blood-2011-07-365510
13 Milani P. Merlini G. Palladini G. Kidney involvement in light chain amyloidosis Journal of Onco-Nephrology 1 2017 110 119
14 Merlini G. Stone M. Dangerous small B-cell clones Blood 108 2006 2520 2530 16794250 10.1182/blood-2006-03-001164
15 Leung N. Bridoux F. Hutchison C.A. Monoclonal gammopathy of renal significance: when MGUS is no longer undetermined or insignificant Blood 120 2012 4292 4295 23047823 10.1182/blood-2012-07-445304
16 Leung N. My patient with monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance has a kidney problem Journal of Onco-Nephrology 1 2017 18 23
17 Teng J. Russell W.J. Gu X. Different types of glomerulopathic light chains interact with mesangial cells using a common receptor but exhibit different intracellular trafficking patterns Lab Invest 84 2004 440 451 14990980 10.1038/labinvest.3700069
18 Keeling J. Teng J. Herrera G. AL-amyloidosis and light-chain deposition disease light chains induce divergent phenotypic transformations of human mesangial cells Lab Invest 84 2004 1322 1338 15286662 10.1038/labinvest.3700161
19 Comenzo R. Wally J. Kica G. Clonal immunoglobulin light chain variable region germline gene use in AL amyloidosis:association with dominant amyloid-related organ involvement and survival after stem cell transplantation Br J Haematol 106 1999 744 751 10468868 10.1046/j.1365-2141.1999.01591.x
20 Comenzo R. Zhang Y. Martinez C. The tropism of organ involvement in primary systemic amyloidosis:contributions of Ig V(L) germ line gene use and clonal plasma cell burden Blood 98 2001 714 720 11468171 10.1182/blood.v98.3.714
21 Perfetti V. Casarini S. Palladini G. Analysis of V(lambda)-J(lambda) expression in plasma cells from primary (AL) amyloidosis and normal bone marrow identifies 3r (lambdaIII) as a new amyloid-associated germline gene segment Blood 100 2002 948 953 12130507 10.1182/blood-2002-01-0114
22 Abraham R. Geyer S. Price-Troska T. Immunoglobulin light chain variable (V) region genes influence clinical presentation and outcome in light chain-associated amyloidosis (AL) Blood 101 2003 3801 3808 12515719 10.1182/blood-2002-09-2707
23 Perfetti V. Palladini G. Casarini S. The repertoire of λ light chains causing predominant amyloid heart involvement and identification of a preferentially involved germline gene, IGLV1–44 Blood 119 2012 144 150 22067386 10.1182/blood-2011-05-355784
24 Kourelis T.V. Dasari S. Theis J.D. Clarifying immunoglobulin gene usage in systemic and localized immunoglobulin light-chain amyloidosis by mass spectrometry Blood 129 2017 299 306 27856462 10.1182/blood-2016-10-743997
25 Palladini G. Merlini G. What is new in diagnosis and management of light chain amyloidosis? Blood 128 2016 159 168 27053535 10.1182/blood-2016-01-629790
26 Muchtar E. Gertz M.A. Kumar S.K. Improved outcomes for newly diagnosed AL amyloidosis between 2000 and 2014: cracking the glass ceiling of early death Blood 129 2017 2111 2119 28126928 10.1182/blood-2016-11-751628 PMC5391625
27 Weiss B.M. Wong S.W. Comenzo R.L. Beyond the plasma cell: emerging therapies for immunoglobulin light chain amyloidosis Blood 127 2016 2275 2280 26907632 10.1182/blood-2015-11-681650
28 Gertz M. Comenzo R. Falk R. Definition of organ involvement and treatment response in immunoglobulin light chain amyloidosis (AL): a consensus opinion from the 10th International Symposium on Amyloid and Amyloidosis, Tours, France, 18–22 April. 2004 Am J Hematol 79 2005 319 328 16044444 10.1002/ajh.20381
29 Palladini G. Comenzo R.L. The challenge of systemic immunoglobulin light-chain amyloidosis (Al) Subcell Biochem 65 2012 609 642 23225018 10.1007/978-94-007-5416-4_22
30 Pinney J.H. Lachmann H.J. Bansi L. Outcome in renal Al amyloidosis after chemotherapy J Clin Oncol 29 2011 674 681 21220614 10.1200/JCO.2010.30.5235
31 Dispenzieri A. Kyle R. Gertz M. Survival in patients with primary systemic amyloidosis and raised serum cardiac troponins Lancet 361 2003 1787 1789 12781539 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)13396-X
32 Palladini G. Campana C. Klersy C. Serum N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide is a sensitive marker of myocardial dysfunction in AL amyloidosis Circulation 107 2003 2440 2445 12719281 10.1161/01.CIR.0000068314.02595.B2
33 Dispenzieri A. Gertz M. Kyle R. Serum cardiac troponins and N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide: a staging system for primary systemic amyloidosis J Clin Oncol 22 2004 3751 3757 15365071 10.1200/JCO.2004.03.029
34 Wechalekar A.D. Schonland S.O. Kastritis E. A European collaborative study of treatment outcomes in 346 patients with cardiac stage III AL amyloidosis Blood 121 2013 3420 3427 23479568 10.1182/blood-2012-12-473066
35 Palladini G. Foli A. Milani P. Best use of cardiac biomarkers in patients with AL amyloidosis and renal failure Am J Hematol 87 2012 465 471 22389105 10.1002/ajh.23141
36 Kourelis T.V. Kumar S.K. Gertz M.A. Coexistent multiple myeloma or increased bone marrow plasma cells define equally high-risk populations in patients with immunoglobulin light chain amyloidosis J Clin Oncol 31 2013 4319 4324 24145344 10.1200/JCO.2013.50.8499 PMC4881366
37 Kumar S. Dispenzieri A. Lacy M.Q. Revised prognostic staging system for light chain amyloidosis incorporating cardiac biomarkers and serum free light chain measurements J Clin Oncol 30 2012 989 995 22331953 10.1200/JCO.2011.38.5724 PMC3675680
38 Palladini G. Milani P. Foli A. Oral melphalan and dexamethasone grants extended survival with minimal toxicity in AL amyloidosis: long-term results of a risk-adapted approach Haematologica 99 2014 743 750 24213149 10.3324/haematol.2013.095463 PMC3971085
39 Milani P. Basset M. Russo F. Patients with light-chain amyloidosis and low free light-chain burden have distinct clinical features and outcome Blood 130 2017 625 631 28546143 10.1182/blood-2017-02-767467
40 Dittrich T. Bochtler T. Kimmich C. AL amyloidosis patients with low amyloidogenic free light chain levels at first diagnosis have an excellent prognosis Blood 130 2017 632 642 28550043 10.1182/blood-2017-02-767475
41 Bochtler T. Hegenbart U. Kunz C. Gain of chromosome 1q21 is an independent adverse prognostic factor in light chain amyloidosis patients treated with melphalan/dexamethasone Amyloid 21 2014 9 17 24455967 10.3109/13506129.2013.854766
42 Bochtler T. Hegenbart U. Kunz C. Translocation t(11;14) is associated with adverse outcome in patients with newly diagnosed AL amyloidosis when treated with bortezomib-based regimens J Clin Oncol 33 2015 1371 1378 25779559 10.1200/JCO.2014.57.4947
43 Bochtler T. Hegenbart U. Kunz C. Prognostic impact of cytogenetic aberrations in AL amyloidosis patients after high-dose melphalan: a long-term follow-up study Blood 128 2016 594 602 27257181 10.1182/blood-2015-10-676361
44 Muchtar E. Dispenzieri A. Kumar S.K. Interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization in untreated AL amyloidosis has an independent prognostic impact by abnormality type and treatment category Leukemia 31 2017 1562 1569 27904139 10.1038/leu.2016.369
45 Palladini G. Hegenbart U. Milani P. A staging system for renal outcome and early markers of renal response to chemotherapy in AL amyloidosis Blood 124 2014 2325 2332 25115890 10.1182/blood-2014-04-570010
46 Kastritis E. Gavriatopoulou M. Roussou M. Renal outcomes in patients with AL amyloidosis: prognostic factors, renal response and the impact of therapy Am J Hematol 92 2017 632 639 28370245 10.1002/ajh.24738
47 Merlini G. Palladini G. Differential diagnosis of monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program 2012 2012 595 603 23233640 10.1182/asheducation-2012.1.595
48 Palladini G. Dispenzieri A. Gertz M.A. New criteria for response to treatment in immunoglobulin light chain amyloidosis based on free light chain measurement and cardiac biomarkers:impact on survival outcomes J Clin Oncol 30 2012 4541 4549 23091105 10.1200/JCO.2011.37.7614
49 Palladini G. Lavatelli F. Russo P. Circulating amyloidogenic free light chains and serum N-terminal natriuretic peptide type B decrease simultaneously in association with improvement of survival in AL Blood 107 2006 3854 3858 16434487 10.1182/blood-2005-11-4385
50 Palladini G. Barassi A. Klersy C. The combination of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T (hs-cTnT) at presentation and changes in N-terminal natriuretic peptide type B (NT-proBNP) after chemotherapy best predicts survival in AL amyloidosis Blood 116 2010 3426 3430 20644111 10.1182/blood-2010-05-286567
51 Leung N. Glavey S.V. Kumar S. A detailed evaluation of the current renal response criteria in AL amyloidosis: is it time for a revision? Haematologica 98 2013 988 992 23729727 10.3324/haematol.2012.079210 PMC3669457
52 Gertz M.A. Lacy M.Q. Dispenzieri A. Refinement in patient selection to reduce treatment-related mortality from autologous stem cell transplantation in amyloidosis Bone Marrow Transplant 48 2013 557 561 22964596 10.1038/bmt.2012.170
53 Dispenzieri A. Buadi F. Kumar S.K. Treatment of immunoglobulin light chain amyloidosis: Mayo Stratification of Myeloma and Risk-Adapted Therapy (mSMART) consensus statement Mayo Clin Proc 90 2015 1054 1081 26250727 10.1016/j.mayocp.2015.06.009
54 Cibeira M.T. Sanchorawala V. Seldin D.C. Outcome of AL amyloidosis after high-dose melphalan and autologous stem cell transplantation: long-term results in a series of 421 patients Blood 118 2011 4346 4352 21828140 10.1182/blood-2011-01-330738 PMC3204906
55 D'Souza A. Dispenzieri A. Wirk B. Improved outcomes after autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation for light chain amyloidosis: a Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research Study J Clin Oncol 33 2015 3741 3749 26371138 10.1200/JCO.2015.62.4015 PMC4737858
56 Sanchorawala V. Sun F. Quillen K. Long-term outcome of patients with AL amyloidosis treated with high-dose melphalan and stem cell transplantation: 20-year experience Blood 126 2015 2345 2347 26443620 10.1182/blood-2015-08-662726
57 Landau H. Smith M. Landry C. Long-term event-free and overall survival after risk-adapted melphalan and SCT for systemic light chain amyloidosis Leukemia 31 2017 136 142 27560108 10.1038/leu.2016.229 PMC5220129
58 Hwa Y.L. Kumar S.K. Gertz M.A. Induction therapy pre-autologous stem cell transplantation in immunoglobulin light chain amyloidosis: a retrospective evaluation Am J Hematol 91 2016 984 988 27341539 10.1002/ajh.24453
59 Irazabal M.V. Eirin A. Gertz M.A. Acute kidney injury during leukocyte engraftment after autologous stem cell transplantation in patients with light-chain amyloidosis Am J Hematol 87 2012 51 54 22076913 10.1002/ajh.22202
60 Minnema M. Nasserinejad K. Hazenberg B. HOVON 104; final results from a multicenter, prospective phase II study of bortezomib based induction treatment followed by autologous stem cell transplantation in patients with de novo al amyloidosis Haematologica 102 2017 144–144 10.3324/haematol.2018.213900 PMC6821610 30923094
61 Palladini G. Perfetti V. Obici L. Association of melphalan and high-dose dexamethasone is effective and well tolerated in patients with AL (primary) amyloidosis who are ineligible for stem cell transplantation Blood 103 2004 2936 2938 15070667 10.1182/blood-2003-08-2788
62 Palladini G. Russo P. Nuvolone M. Treatment with oral melphalan plus dexamethasone produces long-term remissions in AL amyloidosis Blood 110 2007 787 788 17606766 10.1182/blood-2007-02-076034
63 Jaccard A. Moreau P. Leblond V. High-dose melphalan versus melphalan plus dexamethasone for AL amyloidosis N Engl J Med 357 2007 1083 1093 17855669 10.1056/NEJMoa070484
64 Sitia R. Palladini G. Merlini G. Bortezomib in the treatment of AL amyloidosis: targeted therapy? Haematologica 92 2007 1302 1307 18024367 10.3324/haematol.12136
65 Oliva L. Orfanelli U. Resnati M. The amyloidogenic light chain is a stressor that sensitizes plasma cells to proteasome inhibitor toxicity Blood 129 2017 2132 2142 28130214 10.1182/blood-2016-08-730978
66 Kastritis E. Wechalekar A. Dimopoulos M. Bortezomib with or without dexamethasone in primary systemic (light chain) amyloidosis J Clin Oncol 28 2010 1031 1037 20085941 10.1200/JCO.2009.23.8220
67 Reece D. Sanchorawala V. Hegenbart U. Weekly and twice-weekly bortezomib in patients with systemic AL amyloidosis: results of a phase 1 dose-escalation study Blood 114 2009 1489 1497 19498019 10.1182/blood-2009-02-203398
68 Reece D.E. Hegenbart U. Sanchorawala V. Efficacy and safety of once-weekly and twice-weekly bortezomib in patients with relapsed systemic AL amyloidosis: results of a phase 1/2 study Blood 118 2011 865 873 21562045 10.1182/blood-2011-02-334227
69 Reece D.E. Hegenbart U. Sanchorawala V. Long-term follow-up from a phase 1/2 study of single-agent bortezomib in relapsed systemic AL amyloidosis Blood 124 2014 2498 2506 25202139 10.1182/blood-2014-04-568329 PMC4199951
70 Venner C.P. Lane T. Foard D. Cyclophosphamide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone therapy in AL amyloidosis is associated with high clonal response rates and prolonged progression-free survival Blood 119 2012 4387 4390 22331187 10.1182/blood-2011-10-388462
71 Mikhael J.R. Schuster S.R. Jimenez-Zepeda V.H. Cyclophosphamide-bortezomib-dexamethasone (CyBorD) produces rapid and complete hematologic response in patients with AL amyloidosis Blood 119 2012 4391 4394 22331188 10.1182/blood-2011-11-390930 PMC3557400
72 Palladini G. Sachchithanantham S. Milani P. A European collaborative study of cyclophosphamide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone in upfront treatment of systemic AL amyloidosis Blood 126 2015 612 615 25987656 10.1182/blood-2015-01-620302
73 Palladini G. Milani P. Foli A. Melphalan and dexamethasone with or without bortezomib in newly diagnosed AL amyloidosis: a matched case-control study on 174 patients Leukemia 28 2014 2311 2316 25059496 10.1038/leu.2014.227
74 Venner C.P. Gillmore J.D. Sachchithanantham S. A matched comparison of cyclophosphamide, bortezomib and dexamethasone (CVD) versus risk-adapted cyclophosphamide, thalidomide and dexamethasone (CTD) in AL amyloidosis Leukemia 28 2014 2304 2310 25027514 10.1038/leu.2014.218
75 Kastritis E. Leleu X. Arnulf B. A randomized phase III trial of melphalan and dexamethasone (MDex) versus bortezomib, melphalan and dexamethasone (BMDex) for untreated patients with AL amyloidosis Blood 128 2016 646
76 Kastritis E. Gavriatopoulou M. Roussou M. Addition of cyclophosphamide and higher doses of dexamethasone do not improve outcomes of patients with AL amyloidosis treated with bortezomib Blood Cancer J 7 2017 e570 28622303 10.1038/bcj.2017.47 PMC5520394
77 Palladini G. Milani P. Merlini G. Novel strategies for the diagnosis and treatment of cardiac amyloidosis Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther 13 2015 1195 1211 26496239 10.1586/14779072.2015.1093936
78 Tandon N. Sidana S. Gertz M.A. Treatment patterns and outcome following initial relapse or refractory disease in patients with systemic light chain amyloidosis Am J Hematol 92 2017 549 554 28314084 10.1002/ajh.24723
79 Dispenzieri A. Lacy M. Zeldenrust S. The activity of lenalidomide with or without dexamethasone in patients with primary systemic amyloidosis Blood 109 2007 465 470 17008538 10.1182/blood-2006-07-032987
80 Sanchorawala V. Wright D. Rosenzweig M. Lenalidomide and dexamethasone in the treatment of AL amyloidosis: results of a phase 2 trial Blood 109 2007 492 496 16960148 10.1182/blood-2006-07-030544
81 Palladini G. Russo P. Foli A. Salvage therapy with lenalidomide and dexamethasone in patients with advanced AL amyloidosis refractory to melphalan, bortezomib, and thalidomide Ann Hematol 91 2012 89 92 21533608 10.1007/s00277-011-1244-x
82 Kastritis E. Terpos E. Roussou M. A phase 1/2 study of lenalidomide with low-dose oral cyclophosphamide and low-dose dexamethasone (RdC) in AL amyloidosis Blood 119 2012 5384 5390 22517904 10.1182/blood-2011-12-396903
83 Kumar S.K. Hayman S.R. Buadi F.K. Lenalidomide, cyclophosphamide, and dexamethasone (CRd) for light-chain amyloidosis:long-term results from a phase 2 trial Blood 119 2012 4860 4867 22504925 10.1182/blood-2012-01-407791 PMC3418771
84 Mahmood S. Venner C.P. Sachchithanantham S. Lenalidomide and dexamethasone for systemic AL amyloidosis following prior treatment with thalidomide or bortezomib regimens Br J Haematol 166 2014 842 848 24930361 10.1111/bjh.12973
85 Specter R. Sanchorawala V. Seldin D.C. Kidney dysfunction during lenalidomide treatment for AL amyloidosis Nephrol Dial Transplant 26 2011 881 886 20693160 10.1093/ndt/gfq482 PMC3108346
86 Moreau P. Jaccard A. Benboubker L. Lenalidomide in combination with melphalan and dexamethasone in patients with newly diagnosed AL amyloidosis: a multicenter phase 1/2 dose-escalation study Blood 116 2010 4777 4782 20724537 10.1182/blood-2010-07-294405
87 Sanchorawala V. Patel J.M. Sloan J.M. Melphalan, lenalidomide and dexamethasone for the treatment of immunoglobulin light chain amyloidosis: results of a phase II trial Haematologica 98 2013 789 792 23144200 10.3324/haematol.2012.075192 PMC3640126
88 Cibeira M.T. Oriol A. Lahuerta J.J. A phase II trial of lenalidomide, dexamethasone and cyclophosphamide for newly diagnosed patients with systemic immunoglobulin light chain amyloidosis Br J Haematol 170 2015 804 813 25974382 10.1111/bjh.13500
89 Hegenbart U. Bochtler T. Benner A. Lenalidomide/melphalan/dexamethasone in newly diagnosed patients with immunoglobulin light chain amyloidosis: results of a prospective phase 2 study with long-term follow up Haematologica 102 2017 1424 1431 28522573 10.3324/haematol.2016.163246 PMC5541875
90 Dispenzieri A. Buadi F. Laumann K. Activity of pomalidomide in patients with immunoglobulin light-chain amyloidosis Blood 119 2012 5397 5404 22493299 10.1182/blood-2012-02-413161 PMC3369677
91 Sanchorawala V. Shelton A.C. Lo S. Pomalidomide and dexamethasone in the treatment of AL amyloidosis: results of a phase 1 and 2 trial Blood 128 2016 1059 1062 27381904 10.1182/blood-2016-04-710822
92 Palladini G. Milani P. Foli A. A phase 2 trial of pomalidomide and dexamethasone rescue treatment in patients with AL amyloidosis Blood 129 2017 2120 2123 28130212 10.1182/blood-2016-12-756528
93 Cohen A. Landau H. Scott E. Safety and efficacy of carfilzomib (CFZ) in previously-treated systemic light-chain (AL) amyloidosis Blood 128 2016 645
94 Sanchorawala V. Palladini G. Kukreti V. A phase 1/2 study of the oral proteasome inhibitor ixazomib in relapsed or refractory AL amyloidosis Blood 130 2017 597 605 28550039 10.1182/blood-2017-03-771220 PMC6911836
95 Kaufman G.P. Schrier S.L. Lafayette R.A. Daratumumab yields rapid and deep hematologic responses in patients with heavily pretreated AL amyloidosis Blood 130 2017 900 902 28615223 10.1182/blood-2017-01-763599
96 Merlini G. Ascari E. Amboldi N. Interaction of the anthracycline 4'-iodo-4'-deoxydoxorubicin with amyloid fibrils: inhibition of amyloidogenesis Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 92 1995 2959 2963 7708755 10.1073/pnas.92.7.2959 PMC42338
97 Merlini G. Anesi E. Garini P. Treatment of AL amyloidosis with 4'-lodo-4'-deoxydoxorubicin:an update Blood 93 1999 1112 1113 10025983
98 Palha J.A. Ballinari D. Amboldi N. 4'-Iodo-4'-deoxydoxorubicin disrupts the fibrillar structure of transthyretin amyloid Am J Pathol 156 2000 1919 1925 10854215 10.1016/S0002-9440(10)65065-1 PMC1850080
99 Cardoso I. Merlini G. Saraiva M.J. 4'-iodo-4'-deoxydoxorubicin and tetracyclines disrupt transthyretin amyloid fibrils in vitro producing noncytotoxic species:screening for TTR fibril disrupters FASEB J 17 2003 803 809 12724338 10.1096/fj.02-0764com
100 Gertz M. Lacy M. Dispenzieri A. A multicenter phase II trial of 4'-iodo-4'deoxydoxorubicin (IDOX) in primary amyloidosis (AL) Amyloid 9 2002 24 30 12000194 10.3109/13506120209072441
101 Cardoso I. Saraiva M.J. Doxycycline disrupts transthyretin amyloid: evidence from studies in a FAP transgenic mice model FASEB J 20 2006 234 239 16449795 10.1096/fj.05-4509com
102 Ward J.E. Ren R. Toraldo G. Doxycycline reduces fibril formation in a transgenic mouse model of AL amyloidosis Blood 118 2011 6610 6617 21998211 10.1182/blood-2011-04-351643 PMC3242721
103 Diomede L. Rognoni P. Lavatelli F. A Caenorhabditis elegans -based assay recognizes immunoglobulin light chains causing heart amyloidosis Blood 123 2014 3543 3552 24665135 10.1182/blood-2013-10-525634 PMC4047494
104 Wechalekar A.D. Whelan C. Encouraging impact of doxycycline on early mortality in cardiac light chain (AL) amyloidosis Blood Cancer J 7 2017 e546 28338670 10.1038/bcj.2017.26 PMC5380910
105 Diomede L. Romeo M. Rognoni P. Cardiac light chain amyloidosis: the role of metal ions in oxidative stress and mitochondrial damage Antioxid Redox Signal 27 2017 567 582 28132512 10.1089/ars.2016.6848 PMC5567464
106 Ehrnhoefer D.E. Bieschke J. Boeddrich A. EGCG redirects amyloidogenic polypeptides into unstructured, off-pathway oligomers Nat Struct Mol Biol 15 2008 558 566 18511942 10.1038/nsmb.1437
107 Hora M. Carballo-Pacheco M. Weber B. Epigallocatechin-3-gallate preferentially induces aggregation of amyloidogenic immunoglobulin light chains Sci Rep 7 2017 41515 28128355 10.1038/srep41515 PMC5269747
108 Hunstein W. Epigallocathechin-3-gallate in AL amyloidosis: a new therapeutic option? Blood 110 2007 2216 17785589 10.1182/blood-2007-05-089243
109 Mereles D. Buss S.J. Hardt S.E. Effects of the main green tea polyphenol epigallocatechin-3-gallate on cardiac involvement in patients with AL amyloidosis Clin Res Cardiol 99 2010 483 490 20221615 10.1007/s00392-010-0142-x
110 Meshitsuka S. Shingaki S. Hotta M. Phase 2 trial of daily, oral epigallocatechin gallate in patients with light-chain amyloidosis Int J Hematol 105 2017 295 308 27815860 10.1007/s12185-016-2112-1
111 Pepys M. Herbert J. Hutchinson W. Targeted pharmacological depletion of serum amyloid P component for treatment of human amyloidosis Nature 417 2002 254 259 12015594 10.1038/417254a
112 Gillmore J.D. Tennent G.A. Hutchinson W.L. Sustained pharmacological depletion of serum amyloid P component in patients with systemic amyloidosis Br J Haematol 148 2010 760 767 20064157 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2009.08036.x
113 Richards D.B. Cookson L.M. Berges A.C. Therapeutic clearance of amyloid by antibodies to serum amyloid P component N Engl J Med 373 2015 1106 1114 26176329 10.1056/NEJMoa1504942
114 Hrncic R. Wall J. Wolfenbarger D. Antibody-mediated resolution of light chain-associated amyloid deposits Am J Pathol 157 2000 1239 1246 11021828 10.1016/S0002-9440(10)64639-1 PMC1850152
115 Edwards C.V. Gould J. Langer A.L. Interim analysis of the phase 1a/b study of chimeric fibril-reactive monoclonal antibody 11–1F4 in patients with AL amyloidosis Amyloid 24 2017 58 59 28434347 10.1080/13506129.2017.1292900
116 Renz M. Torres R. Dolan P.J. 2A4 binds soluble and insoluble light chain aggregates from AL amyloidosis patients and promotes clearance of amyloid deposits by phagocytosis (†) Amyloid 23 2016 168 177 27494229 10.1080/13506129.2016.1205974 PMC5152553
117 Gertz M.A. Landau H. Comenzo R.L. First-in-human phase I/II Study of NEOD001 in patients with light chain amyloidosis and persistent organ dysfunction J Clin Oncol 34 2016 1097 1103 26858336 10.1200/JCO.2015.63.6530 PMC5470113
118 Gertz M. Comenzo R. Landau H. Patients with light chain amyloidosis treated with NEOD001 achieve rapid organ responses that are independent of previous plasma cell-directed therapies Haematologica 102 2017
119 Caccialanza R. Palladini G. Klersy C. Nutritional status of outpatients with systemic immunoglobulin light-chain amyloidosis Am J Clin Nutr 83 2006 350 354 16469994 10.1093/ajcn/83.2.350
120 Caccialanza R. Palladini G. Klersy C. Nutritional status independently affects quality of life of patients with systemic immunoglobulin light-chain (AL) amyloidosis Ann Hematol 91 2012 399 406 21826471 10.1007/s00277-011-1309-x
121 Caccialanza R. Palladini G. Klersy C. Malnutrition at diagnosis predicts mortality in patients with systemic immunoglobulin light-chain amyloidosis independently of cardiac stage and response to treatment JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr 38 2014 891 894 24072737 10.1177/0148607113501328
122 Caccialanza R. Palladini G. Cereda E. Nutritional counseling improves quality of life and preserves body weight in systemic immunoglobulin light-chain (AL) amyloidosis Nutrition 31 2015 1228 1234 26250487 10.1016/j.nut.2015.04.011
123 Kaysen G.A. Gambertoglio J. Jimenez I. Effect of dietary protein intake on albumin homeostasis in nephrotic patients Kidney Int 29 1986 572 577 3702214 10.1038/ki.1986.36
124 Sica D.A. Metolazone and its role in edema management Congest Heart Fail 9 2003 100 105 12671341 10.1111/j.1527-5299.2003.01907.x
125 Bernardi L. Passino C. Porta C. Widespread cardiovascular autonomic dysfunction in primary amyloidosis:does spontaneous hyperventilation have a compensatory role against postural hypotension? Heart 88 2002 615 621 12433892 10.1136/heart.88.6.615 PMC1767452
126 Wechalekar A.D. Gillmore J.D. Hawkins P.N. Systemic amyloidosis Lancet 387 2016 2641 2654 26719234 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)01274-X
Acknowledgments
This study was supported in part by a grant from “Associazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro—Special Program Molecular Clinical Oncology 5 per mille n. 9965,” from CARIPLO “Structure-function relation of amyloid: understanding the molecular bases of protein misfolding diseases to design new treatments n. 2013–0964,” and from CARIPLO “Molecular mechanisms of Ig toxicity in age-related plasma cell dyscrasias n. 2015–0591.” GP is supported in part by the Bart Barlogie Young Investigator Award from the International Myeloma Society.