MedElevator
Войти в исследования Journal of laparoendoscopic & advanced surgical techniques. Part A · 2008
Which biopsy method is more suitable between a basin dissection and pick-up biopsy for sentinel nodes in laparoscopic sentinel-node navigation surgery (LSNNS) for gastric cancer?
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Lee Young-Joon, Ha Woo-Song, Park Soon-Tae, Choi Sang-Kyung, Hong Soon-Chan, Park Jung-Woo
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Sentinel-node navigation surgery (SNNS) for breast cancer and melanoma has been accepted as a reasonable oncologic surgery worldwide. On the other hand, in gastric cancers that do metastasize well to the lymph node, the use of SNNS has been approached with care and performed in only limited cases. Some obstacles still have to be overcome, such as the shortcomings of SN tracers and the technical limitations of laparoscopic SN detection. The aims of this study were to determine whether laparoscopic SNNS is possible, and which biopsy method is more suitable for SN tracers, in gastric cancer, preoperatively diagnosed as < or =T2 and with < or =4-cm-sized lesions.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between January 2005 and October 2006, 92 consecutive patients that underwent LSNNS, using a combined indocyanine green and (99m)Tc-labeled tin colloid technique, were prospectively studied. SNs were laparoscopically removed by using two biopsy methods: a basin dissection and pick-up method, with the results of these two SN biopsy methods then compared with the final diagnosis obtained from a permanent section.
RESULTS: With the pick-up method, SNs were identified in 23 of 42 patients (54.8%); however, with basin dissection, the detection rate was 96% (48 of 50 patients). The average number of SNs detected by the two methods were 2.1 (range, 0-4) and 3.5 (range, 1-7), respectively. The sensitivities of the two methods were 66% (4/6) and 85.7% (12/14), with specificities of 100% (17/17) and 100% (34/34), respectively.
CONCLUSION: In gastric cancer, it was possible to perform LSNNS. At this moment, we believe the laparoscopic basin dissection technique with a dual-tracer injection, followed by SN detection on the back table, will be a reasonable procedure for gastric cancer, owing to the shortcomings related to the dye and radioisotope, the so-called "stained lymphatic duct only" and "shine-through phenomenon."
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between January 2005 and October 2006, 92 consecutive patients that underwent LSNNS, using a combined indocyanine green and (99m)Tc-labeled tin colloid technique, were prospectively studied. SNs were laparoscopically removed by using two biopsy methods: a basin dissection and pick-up method, with the results of these two SN biopsy methods then compared with the final diagnosis obtained from a permanent section.
RESULTS: With the pick-up method, SNs were identified in 23 of 42 patients (54.8%); however, with basin dissection, the detection rate was 96% (48 of 50 patients). The average number of SNs detected by the two methods were 2.1 (range, 0-4) and 3.5 (range, 1-7), respectively. The sensitivities of the two methods were 66% (4/6) and 85.7% (12/14), with specificities of 100% (17/17) and 100% (34/34), respectively.
CONCLUSION: In gastric cancer, it was possible to perform LSNNS. At this moment, we believe the laparoscopic basin dissection technique with a dual-tracer injection, followed by SN detection on the back table, will be a reasonable procedure for gastric cancer, owing to the shortcomings related to the dye and radioisotope, the so-called "stained lymphatic duct only" and "shine-through phenomenon."