The Journal of emergency medicine · 2025
Complications of Ultrasound-Guided Peripheral Nerve Blocks in the Emergency Department: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
СтатьяСистематический обзорМетаанализНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Gu Joyce Hanyue, Cotarelo Adrian, Samarneh Mark
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Ultrasound-guided nerve block (USGNB) is a technique which employs ultrasound guidance to improve the accuracy of anesthetic delivery in nerve block procedures, which leads to decreased analgesic use, fewer adverse effects, and increased patient satisfaction. While USGNB is traditionally administered by trained anesthesiologists in the perioperative setting, it also offers potential to improve pain management practices in the emergency department (ED).
OBJECTIVE: Our objective is to assess the safety of USGNB in the ED setting.
METHODS: We performed a systematic review and random effects model meta-analysis to estimate the complication rates of USGNB in the ED setting and the odds ratio of complication rates compared to standard of care analgesia. We searched records retrieved from PubMed and Google Scholar. Studies which examined ED-performed USGNB and reported adverse event statistics were included.
RESULTS: Our systematic review screen yielded 179 retrievable studies, of which we included 53. A subset of 22 studies provided calculating odds ratios compared to standard analgesia. USGNB in the ED setting demonstrated a complication rate of 0.05 (95% CI [0.03, 0.07]) and a lower odds ratio 0.17 (95% CI 29 [0.08, 0.37]) of complications compared with standard analgesia.
CONCLUSION: Current evidence suggests that USGNB in the ED setting confers a low risk of complications and offers safety advantages over standard analgesia.
OBJECTIVE: Our objective is to assess the safety of USGNB in the ED setting.
METHODS: We performed a systematic review and random effects model meta-analysis to estimate the complication rates of USGNB in the ED setting and the odds ratio of complication rates compared to standard of care analgesia. We searched records retrieved from PubMed and Google Scholar. Studies which examined ED-performed USGNB and reported adverse event statistics were included.
RESULTS: Our systematic review screen yielded 179 retrievable studies, of which we included 53. A subset of 22 studies provided calculating odds ratios compared to standard analgesia. USGNB in the ED setting demonstrated a complication rate of 0.05 (95% CI [0.03, 0.07]) and a lower odds ratio 0.17 (95% CI 29 [0.08, 0.37]) of complications compared with standard analgesia.
CONCLUSION: Current evidence suggests that USGNB in the ED setting confers a low risk of complications and offers safety advantages over standard analgesia.