Pediatrics · 2009
Work of breathing and different levels of volume-targeted ventilation.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Patel Deena-Shefali, Sharma Atul, Prendergast Michael, Rafferty Gerrard F, Greenough Anne
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: The objectives of this study were to determine the impact of different volume-targeted levels on the work of breathing and to investigate whether a level that reduced the work of breathing below that experienced during ventilatory support without volume targeting could be determined.
METHODS: The transdiaphragmatic pressure-time product, as an estimate of the work of breathing, was measured for 20 infants (median gestational age: 28 weeks) who were being weaned from respiratory support by using patient-triggered ventilation (either assist-control ventilation or synchronous intermittent mandatory ventilation). The transdiaphragmatic pressure-time product was measured first without volume targeting (baseline) and then at volume-targeted levels of 4, 5, and 6 mL/kg, delivered in random order. After each volume-targeted level, the infants were returned to baseline. Each step was maintained for 20 minutes.
RESULTS: The mean transdiaphragmatic pressure-time product was higher with volume targeting at 4 mL/kg in comparison with baseline, regardless of the patient-triggered mode. The transdiaphragmatic pressure-time product was higher at a volume-targeted level of 4 mL/kg in comparison with 5 mL/kg and at 5 mL/kg in comparison with 6 mL/kg. The mean work of breathing was below that at baseline only at a volume-targeted level of 6 mL/kg.
CONCLUSIONS: Low volume-targeted levels increase the work of breathing during volume-targeted ventilation. Our results suggest that, during weaning, a volume-targeted level of 6 mL/kg, rather than a lower level, could be used to avoid an increase in the work of breathing.
METHODS: The transdiaphragmatic pressure-time product, as an estimate of the work of breathing, was measured for 20 infants (median gestational age: 28 weeks) who were being weaned from respiratory support by using patient-triggered ventilation (either assist-control ventilation or synchronous intermittent mandatory ventilation). The transdiaphragmatic pressure-time product was measured first without volume targeting (baseline) and then at volume-targeted levels of 4, 5, and 6 mL/kg, delivered in random order. After each volume-targeted level, the infants were returned to baseline. Each step was maintained for 20 minutes.
RESULTS: The mean transdiaphragmatic pressure-time product was higher with volume targeting at 4 mL/kg in comparison with baseline, regardless of the patient-triggered mode. The transdiaphragmatic pressure-time product was higher at a volume-targeted level of 4 mL/kg in comparison with 5 mL/kg and at 5 mL/kg in comparison with 6 mL/kg. The mean work of breathing was below that at baseline only at a volume-targeted level of 6 mL/kg.
CONCLUSIONS: Low volume-targeted levels increase the work of breathing during volume-targeted ventilation. Our results suggest that, during weaning, a volume-targeted level of 6 mL/kg, rather than a lower level, could be used to avoid an increase in the work of breathing.