MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1177/17504589251320818

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of perioperative practice · 2025

Association of polypharmacy and perioperative outcomes: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Lee Yixuan, Liew Yixin, Sim Mui Hian, Sim Xiu Ling Jacqueline

СтатьяСистематический обзорМетаанализПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

Polypharmacy is becoming more prevalent due to an ageing population. As more patients are undergoing surgical procedures, it is important to determine which group of patients are at higher risk of poorer outcomes. This review aimed to provide a summary of existing literature and to determine if polypharmacy is associated with poorer perioperative outcomes and to identify any gaps in the literature. This systematic review was conducted using electronic databases PubMed, Embase and Web of Science from their inception to December 2024. Statistical analysis was performed using generic inverse variance method. We identified 45 eligible studies from different countries and different surgical populations. Thirty-two studies (71.11%) defined polypharmacy as the use of five or more medications. Polypharmacy is significantly associated with postoperative delirium (odds ratio = 1.62, 95% confidence interval = 1.32-1.98, I2 = 0%). Although polypharmacy is found to be significantly associated with postoperative delirium, the relationship between polypharmacy and postoperative delirium remains complex.

Для цитирования: Lee Yixuan, Liew Yixin, Sim Mui Hian, Sim Xiu Ling Jacqueline. Association of polypharmacy and perioperative outcomes: Systematic review and meta-analysis.. Journal of perioperative practice. 2025. DOI: 10.1177/17504589251320818.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.