MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1007/s11255-025-04695-9

Медицинская библиотека · International urology and nephrology · 2025

Evaluating less-invasive strategies for localized prostate cancer: a comparative meta-analysis on high-intensity focused ultrasound versus radical prostatectomy.

Lepine Henrique L, Vicentini Fabio C, Filho Christiano Machado, Cavalcante Guilherme, Llata Fernanda M, Júnior José Bessa, Reis Leonardo O, Mota José Maurício, Nahas William Carlos, Ribeiro-Filho Leopoldo Alves, Suartz Caio Vinícius

СтатьяМетаанализСистематический обзорСравнительное исследованиеПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

PURPOSE: Prostate cancer is frequently managed with radical prostatectomy (RP), which can offer excellent oncological control but with significant genitourinary morbidity. High-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) has emerged as a less-invasive alternative. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the oncological, functional, and safety outcomes of HIFU versus RP in men with localized prostate cancer.

METHODS

Following PRISMA guidelines, we searched Medline, Embase, and Cochrane through December 2024 for comparative studies of HIFU and RP. Fourteen studies (including two randomized trials) met inclusion criteria. The primary endpoint was salvage therapy-free survival (STFS). Secondary outcomes included biochemical recurrence, metastasis-free survival, functional outcomes, and complications. Random-effect models were applied, and meta-regression explored sources of heterogeneity.

RESULTS

Overall, HIFU was associated with lower STFS (odds ratio [OR]: 0.65, p = 0.02) although biochemical recurrence and metastasis-free survival did not differ significantly between treatments. Focal HIFU showed fewer major complications (OR: 0.36) and significantly better erectile function preservation (OR: 6.03), but minor complications were slightly more frequent. High heterogeneity was partly explained by study design and follow-up duration. Limitations include substantial heterogeneity, variable definitions of outcomes, and relatively short follow-ups in some studies.

CONCLUSION

For selected patients, biochemical recurrence and metastasis-free survival did not differ significantly between treatments although HIFU was associated with lower STFS. Particularly as focal therapy, it shows the potential to achieve oncologic outcomes comparable to radical prostatectomy while enhancing erectile function preservation, urinary continence, and reducing major complications. Further long-term prospective studies are warranted to solidify these findings.

Для цитирования: Lepine Henrique L, Vicentini Fabio C, Filho Christiano Machado, Cavalcante Guilherme, Llata Fernanda M, Júnior José Bessa, Reis Leonardo O, Mota José Maurício, Nahas William Carlos, Ribeiro-Filho Leopoldo Alves, Suartz Caio Vinícius. Evaluating less-invasive strategies for localized prostate cancer: a comparative meta-analysis on high-intensity focused ultrasound versus radical prostatectomy.. International urology and nephrology. 2025. DOI: 10.1007/s11255-025-04695-9.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.