Valve selection for the aortic position in dialysis patients.

BACKGROUND

Prosthetic valve selection in dialysis patients remains controversial because of the limited data available. This study aimed to clarify late clinical outcomes and discuss strategies for optimal valve selection in dialysis patients.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed the data obtained from 406 consecutive patients who underwent aortic valve replacement between 1995 and 2010. We compared valve-related outcomes among 89 dialysis and 317 nondialysis patients. We selected bioprostheses for all patients older than 65 to 70 years, irrespective of the renal function.

RESULTS

Dialysis was found to be a significant risk factor for bleeding events (hazard ratio, 3.98; 95% confidence interval, 2.51 to 6.30; p < 0.001), however, no significant differences were observed according to the type of prosthesis. The overall survival was significantly worse in the dialysis patients (63% versus 85% at 5 years; p < 0.001), and freedom from structural valve deterioration was also lower in the dialysis patients (82% versus 100% at 5 years; p < 0.001). Among the dialysis patients, an advanced age (≥ 70 years; hazard ratio, 3.53; p = 0.011), diabetes mellitus (hazard ratio, 2.48; p = 0.041), and concomitant coronary artery bypass grafting (hazard ratio, 1.99; p = 0.071) were independent predictors for late death based on a multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Our valve selection criteria in dialysis patients, which are the same as the current practice guidelines for nondialysis patients, are acceptable. Bioprostheses can be considered in all dialysis patients with diabetes or coronary artery disease.