The American journal of sports medicine · 2006
Recurrent subluxation of the peroneal tendons.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Maffulli Nicola, Ferran Nicholas Antonio, Oliva Francesco, Testa Vittorino
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Recurrent peroneal tendon subluxation is uncommon.
HYPOTHESIS: The authors tested the null hypothesis that there are no differences between preoperative and postoperative status after anatomical repair of the superior peroneal retinaculum.
STUDY DESIGN: Case series; Level of evidence, 4.
METHODS: In the period 1996 to 2001, the authors operated on 14 patients (all men; mean age, 25.3 +/- 6.3 years; range, 18-37 years) with traumatic recurrent unilateral peroneal tendon subluxation, with a follow-up of 38 +/- 3 months (range, 22-47 months).
RESULTS: No patient experienced a further episode of peroneal tendon subluxation, and all had returned to their normal activities. Maximum calf circumference, functional ability, peak torque, total work, and mean power of plantar flexion were always lower in the operated leg, but the differences did not reach statistical significance. The American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society Ankle-Hindfoot Scale score increased significantly from 54.3 +/- 11.4 to 94.5 +/- 6.4 (P = .03), with 5 patients reporting a fully normal ankle.
CONCLUSION: If an anatomical approach is used, reattachment of the superior retinaculum is a most appropriate technique. It returns patients to a high level of physical activity and gives a high rate of satisfactory results both objectively and subjectively. Randomized control trials may be the way forward in determining the best surgical management method. However, the relative rarity of the condition and the large number of techniques make such a study difficult.
HYPOTHESIS: The authors tested the null hypothesis that there are no differences between preoperative and postoperative status after anatomical repair of the superior peroneal retinaculum.
STUDY DESIGN: Case series; Level of evidence, 4.
METHODS: In the period 1996 to 2001, the authors operated on 14 patients (all men; mean age, 25.3 +/- 6.3 years; range, 18-37 years) with traumatic recurrent unilateral peroneal tendon subluxation, with a follow-up of 38 +/- 3 months (range, 22-47 months).
RESULTS: No patient experienced a further episode of peroneal tendon subluxation, and all had returned to their normal activities. Maximum calf circumference, functional ability, peak torque, total work, and mean power of plantar flexion were always lower in the operated leg, but the differences did not reach statistical significance. The American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society Ankle-Hindfoot Scale score increased significantly from 54.3 +/- 11.4 to 94.5 +/- 6.4 (P = .03), with 5 patients reporting a fully normal ankle.
CONCLUSION: If an anatomical approach is used, reattachment of the superior retinaculum is a most appropriate technique. It returns patients to a high level of physical activity and gives a high rate of satisfactory results both objectively and subjectively. Randomized control trials may be the way forward in determining the best surgical management method. However, the relative rarity of the condition and the large number of techniques make such a study difficult.