MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1097/ju.0000000000003902

Медицинская библиотека · The Journal of urology · 2024

Prophylactic Use of Biologic Mesh in Ileal Conduit (PUBMIC): A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Djaladat Hooman, Ghoreifi Alireza, Tejura Tapas, Miranda Gus, Cai Jie, Sheybaee Moghaddam Farshad, Aldana Ileana, Sotelo Rene, Gill Inderbir, Bhanvadia Sumeet, Schuckman Anne, Desai Mihir, Aron Monish, Daneshmand Siamak, Duddalwar Vinay

СтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеКлиническое исследование III фазыПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

PURPOSE: We assessed the effect of prophylactic biologic mesh on parastomal hernia (PSH) development in patients undergoing cystectomy and ileal conduit (IC).

MATERIALS AND

METHODS

This phase 3, randomized, controlled trial (NCT02439060) included 146 patients who underwent cystectomy and IC at the University of Southern California between 2015 and 2021. Follow-ups were physical exam and CT every 4 to 6 months up to 2 years. Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive FlexHD prophylactic biological mesh using sublay intraperitoneal technique vs standard IC. The primary end point was time to radiological PSH, and secondary outcomes included clinical PSH with/without surgical intervention and mesh-related complications.

RESULTS

The 2 arms were similar in terms of baseline clinical features. All surgeries and mesh placements were performed without any intraoperative complications. Median operative time was 31 minutes longer in patients who received mesh, yet with no statistically significant difference (363 vs 332 minutes, P = .16). With a median follow-up of 24 months, radiological and clinical PSHs were detected in 37 (18 mesh recipients vs 19 controls) and 16 (8 subjects in both arms) patients, with a median time to radiological and clinical PSH of 8.3 and 15.5 months, respectively. No definite mesh-related adverse events were reported. Five patients (3 in the mesh and 2 in the control arm) required surgical PSH repair. Radiological PSH-free survival rates in the mesh and control groups were 74% vs 75% at 1 year and 69% vs 62% at 2 years.

CONCLUSIONS

Implementation of biologic mesh at the time of IC construction is safe without significant protective effects within 2 years following surgery.

Для цитирования: Djaladat Hooman, Ghoreifi Alireza, Tejura Tapas, Miranda Gus, Cai Jie, Sheybaee Moghaddam Farshad, Aldana Ileana, Sotelo Rene, Gill Inderbir, Bhanvadia Sumeet, Schuckman Anne, Desai Mihir, Aron Monish, Daneshmand Siamak, Duddalwar Vinay. Prophylactic Use of Biologic Mesh in Ileal Conduit (PUBMIC): A Randomized Clinical Trial.. The Journal of urology. 2024. DOI: 10.1097/ju.0000000000003902.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.