MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1097/scs.0b013e31827c7d59

Медицинская библиотека · The Journal of craniofacial surgery · 2013

The comparative study of mandibular ramus growth with different treatment methods for intracapsular condylar fracture.

Li Lingzhi, Feng Zhiqiang, Ma Rui, Yang Chi, He Dongmei

Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate mandibular ramus growth after different treatment methods for intracapsular condylar fracture (ICF) of growing goats.

METHOD: Twelve 6-month-old goats were randomly divided into 3 groups (n = 4). The right ICF was created and respectively treated with open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) and closed treatment. No operation was taken in the control group. The maximum mouth opening and height of mandibular ramus were measured immediately and 3 months after operation by 3-dimensional computed tomographic analysis. Results of the 3 groups were compared statistically.

RESULTS

Maximum mouth opening in the closed treatment group was significantly reduced 3 months after operation than before operation (P < 0.05), but not in ORIF and control groups (P > 0.05). Heights of mandibular ramus in ORIF and control groups were significantly longer than that in the closed treatment group 3 months after operation (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Open reduction and internal fixation is an efficient method to treat ICF of growing goats. It has a better effect on maintaining mandibular ramus growth than closed treatment.

Для цитирования: Li Lingzhi, Feng Zhiqiang, Ma Rui, Yang Chi, He Dongmei. The comparative study of mandibular ramus growth with different treatment methods for intracapsular condylar fracture.. The Journal of craniofacial surgery. 2013. DOI: 10.1097/scs.0b013e31827c7d59.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.