MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1097/sle.0b013e3181f39ff1

Медицинская библиотека · Surgical laparoscopy, endoscopy & percutaneous techniques · 2010

Revisional surgery after gastrectomy for gastric cancer: review of the literature.

Etoh Tsuyoshi, Inomata Masafumi, Shiraishi Norio, Kitano Seigo

СтатьяОбзорПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

Recent reports have shown that morbidity and mortality after gastrectomy for gastric cancer vary between authors, countries, and procedures. Common complications related to gastrectomy are postoperative bleeding, anastomotic leakage, pancreatic juice leakage, intra-abdominal abscess, intestinal obstruction, wound dehiscence, and so on. Recently, laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer has developed, especially in Japan and East Asian countries because it is less invasive. Several retrospective studies have shown that the operative complication rate is similar to that of conventional open surgery. Although most postoperative complications can be successfully treated by conservative therapies, surgical management is occasionally needed to prevent a fatal outcome. This review article provides insight into how surgeons can make efforts to reduce postoperative complications through proper preoperative evaluation and improved surgical skills during the initial gastrectomy. In addition, it reviews guidance for timely revisional surgery to allow salvage of patients with serious acute operative complications based on clinical findings made by a group of experienced surgeons.

Для цитирования: Etoh Tsuyoshi, Inomata Masafumi, Shiraishi Norio, Kitano Seigo. Revisional surgery after gastrectomy for gastric cancer: review of the literature.. Surgical laparoscopy, endoscopy & percutaneous techniques. 2010. DOI: 10.1097/sle.0b013e3181f39ff1.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.