BJU international · 2010
Expression of E-series prostaglandin (EP) receptors and urodynamic effects of an EP4 receptor antagonist on cyclophosphamide-induced overactive bladder in rats.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Chuang Yao-Chi, Yoshimura Naoki, Huang Chao-Cheng, Wu Moya, Tyagi Pradeep, Chancellor Michael B
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the expression of four subtypes of E-series prostaglandin (EP(1) -EP(4) ) receptors and the urodynamic effects of an EP(4) receptor antagonist (AH23848) in cyclophosphamide (CYP)-induced overactive bladder (OAB) in rats, as intravesical prostaglandin E(2) (PGE(2) ) induces OAB via activation of EP receptors and sensitization of afferent nerves.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Experimental and control rats were injected with CYP (200 mg/kg, intraperitoneally) or saline, respectively. Continuous cystometrograms (CMGs) were performed 48 h after CYP or saline injection under urethane anaesthesia. AH23848 was given intravenously at doses of 0.01 and 0.1 mg/kg. The bladder was then harvested for histology. Some bladders were harvested for analysis of EP receptors expression by Western blotting without a CMG study. CMG variables (baseline pressure; intercontraction interval [ICI], pressure threshold [PT], contraction amplitude) and histological changes were measured.
RESULTS: CYP-induced up-regulation of EP(4) receptor (100% increase) accompanied by detrusor overactivity (ICI 70.5% decrease; PT, 67.7% increase). However, CYP down-regulated EP(1) receptor expression (51.9% decrease), but had no significant effects on the EP(2) and EP(3) receptors. AH23848 significantly extended the ICI in CYP-treated rats but it had no effects on other urodynamic variables or in control rats.
CONCLUSIONS: Modulation of EP receptors plays a role in CYP-induced OAB. Antagonists to the EP(4) receptor may be a new target for treatment of patients with OAB.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Experimental and control rats were injected with CYP (200 mg/kg, intraperitoneally) or saline, respectively. Continuous cystometrograms (CMGs) were performed 48 h after CYP or saline injection under urethane anaesthesia. AH23848 was given intravenously at doses of 0.01 and 0.1 mg/kg. The bladder was then harvested for histology. Some bladders were harvested for analysis of EP receptors expression by Western blotting without a CMG study. CMG variables (baseline pressure; intercontraction interval [ICI], pressure threshold [PT], contraction amplitude) and histological changes were measured.
RESULTS: CYP-induced up-regulation of EP(4) receptor (100% increase) accompanied by detrusor overactivity (ICI 70.5% decrease; PT, 67.7% increase). However, CYP down-regulated EP(1) receptor expression (51.9% decrease), but had no significant effects on the EP(2) and EP(3) receptors. AH23848 significantly extended the ICI in CYP-treated rats but it had no effects on other urodynamic variables or in control rats.
CONCLUSIONS: Modulation of EP receptors plays a role in CYP-induced OAB. Antagonists to the EP(4) receptor may be a new target for treatment of patients with OAB.