The Laryngoscope · 2006
Lidocaine block of the recurrent laryngeal nerve in adductor spasmodic dysphonia: a multidimensional assessment.
СтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Smith Marshall E, Roy Nelson, Wilson Cathy
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: Lidocaine block of the recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN) has been reported as a procedure for surgical selection of patients with adductor spasmodic dysphonia (ADSD). However, its effects on phonation have not been rigorously assessed in a prospective fashion using strict entry criteria and multiple measures of phonatory function. This investigation assessed the phonatory effects of RLN lidocaine block in ADSD to explore its potential as a diagnostic tool.
STUDY DESIGN: Single group, pre/postexperimental trial.
METHODS: Twenty-one consecutive patients with suspected ADSD underwent unilateral RLN block, causing temporary ipsilateral vocal fold paralysis. Voices were recorded before and during the block. Patients completed self-ratings of overall level of dysphonia severity, vocal effort, and laryngeal tightness. Blinded listeners completed auditory-perceptual ratings, and the frequency of phonatory breaks was acoustically analyzed.
RESULTS: During the block, patients reported significant reductions on overall severity (P = .045), vocal effort (P < .001), and laryngeal tightness (P = .002). Listeners rated the voices during the block as significantly more breathy (P < .001), less strained (P < .001), and less severe (P = .059). Acoustic analysis confirmed significantly fewer phonatory breaks during the block (P < .001). Patient-based ratings of improvement were more consistent than listener ratings, and reduction in overall severity correlated with perceived breathiness.
CONCLUSIONS: Although individuals varied in their outcomes, group results suggest that response to RLN lidocaine block warrants further study as a possible diagnostic tool in ADSD.
STUDY DESIGN: Single group, pre/postexperimental trial.
METHODS: Twenty-one consecutive patients with suspected ADSD underwent unilateral RLN block, causing temporary ipsilateral vocal fold paralysis. Voices were recorded before and during the block. Patients completed self-ratings of overall level of dysphonia severity, vocal effort, and laryngeal tightness. Blinded listeners completed auditory-perceptual ratings, and the frequency of phonatory breaks was acoustically analyzed.
RESULTS: During the block, patients reported significant reductions on overall severity (P = .045), vocal effort (P < .001), and laryngeal tightness (P = .002). Listeners rated the voices during the block as significantly more breathy (P < .001), less strained (P < .001), and less severe (P = .059). Acoustic analysis confirmed significantly fewer phonatory breaks during the block (P < .001). Patient-based ratings of improvement were more consistent than listener ratings, and reduction in overall severity correlated with perceived breathiness.
CONCLUSIONS: Although individuals varied in their outcomes, group results suggest that response to RLN lidocaine block warrants further study as a possible diagnostic tool in ADSD.