MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.injury.2022.07.001

Медицинская библиотека · Injury · 2022

Update of the CHIP (CT in Head Injury Patients) decision rule for patients with minor head injury based on a multicenter consecutive case series.

van den Brand Crispijn L, Foks Kelly A, Lingsma Hester F, van der Naalt Joukje, Jacobs Bram, de Jong Eline, den Boogert Hugo F, Sir Özcan, Patka Peter, Polinder Suzanne, Gaakeer Menno I, Schutte Charlotte E, Jie Kim E, Visee Huib F, Hunink Myriam Gm, Reijners Eef, Braaksma Meriam, Schoonman Guus G, Steyerberg Ewout W, Dippel Diederik Wj, Jellema Korné

СтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

To update the existing CHIP (CT in Head Injury Patients) decision rule for detection of (intra)cranial findings in adult patients following minor head injury (MHI).

METHODS

The study is a prospective multicenter cohort study in the Netherlands. Consecutive MHI patients of 16 years and older were included. Primary outcome was any (intra)cranial traumatic finding on computed tomography (CT). Secondary outcomes were any potential neurosurgical lesion and neurosurgical intervention. The CHIP model was validated and subsequently updated and revised. Diagnostic performance was assessed by calculating the c-statistic.

RESULTS

Among 4557 included patients 3742 received a CT (82%). In 383 patients (8.4%) a traumatic finding was present on CT. A potential neurosurgical lesion was found in 73 patients (1.6%) with 26 (0.6%) patients that actually had neurosurgery or died as a result of traumatic brain injury. The original CHIP underestimated the risk of traumatic (intra)cranial findings in low-predicted-risk groups, while in high-predicted-risk groups the risk was overestimated. The c-statistic of the original CHIP model was 0.72 (95% CI 0.69-0.74) and it would have missed two potential neurosurgical lesions and one patient that underwent neurosurgery. The updated model performed similar to the original model regarding traumatic (intra)cranial findings (c-statistic 0.77 95% CI 0.74-0.79, after crossvalidation c-statistic 0.73). The updated CHIP had the same CT rate as the original CHIP (75%) and a similar sensitivity (92 versus 93%) and specificity (both 27%) for any traumatic (intra)cranial finding. However, the updated CHIP would not have missed any (potential) neurosurgical lesions and had a higher sensitivity for (potential) neurosurgical lesions or death as a result of traumatic brain injury (100% versus 96%).

CONCLUSIONS

Use of the updated CHIP decision rule is a good alternative to current decision rules for patients with MHI. In contrast to the original CHIP the update identified all patients with (potential) neurosurgical lesions without increasing CT rate.

Для цитирования: van den Brand Crispijn L, Foks Kelly A, Lingsma Hester F, van der Naalt Joukje, Jacobs Bram, de Jong Eline, den Boogert Hugo F, Sir Özcan, Patka Peter, Polinder Suzanne, Gaakeer Menno I, Schutte Charlotte E, Jie Kim E, Visee Huib F, Hunink Myriam Gm, Reijners Eef, Braaksma Meriam, Schoonman Guus G, Steyerberg Ewout W, Dippel Diederik Wj, Jellema Korné. Update of the CHIP (CT in Head Injury Patients) decision rule for patients with minor head injury based on a multicenter consecutive case series.. Injury. 2022. DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2022.07.001.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.