MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1089/ped.2024.0036

Медицинская библиотека · Pediatric allergy, immunology, and pulmonology · 2024

A Case Report and Pediatric Literature Review: Povidone as a Rare Cause of Anaphylaxis in Children.

Baysal Sumeyye, Anil Hulya, Harmanci Koray

СтатьяКлинический случайОбзорПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

Background

Povidone, a synthetic polymer commonly used in various products such as antiseptics, cosmetics, and medications, has been associated with allergic reactions, including anaphylaxis. Despite its widespread use, cases of povidone-induced anaphylaxis, especially in children, are under-recognized. This case report aims to highlight the importance of considering povidone allergy in pediatric patients presenting with anaphylaxis. Case Presentation: We describe a 3-year-old boy who experienced anaphylaxis following the application of povidone-iodine antiseptic solution to a leg wound. He presented with generalized urticaria, angioedema, dyspnea, and cough. Prompt diagnosis and management were initiated in the emergency department. He experienced the second anaphylaxis with povidone-containing eye drops prescribed during an ophthalmology visit.

Conclusions

Povidone allergy should be considered in pediatric patients presenting with anaphylaxis, especially those with idiopathic reactions or multiple drug allergies. Clinicians should emphasize patient education on label reading and the provision of adrenaline autoinjectors to prevent life-threatening reactions associated with povidone exposure.

Для цитирования: Baysal Sumeyye, Anil Hulya, Harmanci Koray. A Case Report and Pediatric Literature Review: Povidone as a Rare Cause of Anaphylaxis in Children.. Pediatric allergy, immunology, and pulmonology. 2024. DOI: 10.1089/ped.2024.0036.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.