MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1097/md.0000000000011723

Медицинская библиотека · Medicine · 2018

Massive retroperitoneal hematoma following colonoscopy: A case report.

Ohtsuka Reo, Amano Hodaka, Niida Kei, Yoshino Takeaki, Owari Michiyo, Takano Ryotaro, Akama Yuichi, Watanabe Yohei, Iwao Toshiyasu

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

RATIONALE: Colonoscopy has been used for screening and treatment of diseases worldwide. Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) has many major complications such as colon perforation and bleeding. However, cases of minor complications have also been reported. Here, we present a case of massive retroperitoneal hematoma, as a minor complication, after colonoscopy.

PATIENT CONCERNS: A 57-year-old man was admitted to our hospital because of abdominal pain. He had no past medical history relating to his present condition, and he received EMR at another hospital 11 days before his admission. Dynamic computed tomography (CT) was performed, which showed a massive retroperitoneal hematoma near the third portion of the duodenum.

DIAGNOSIS: The patient had a superior mesenteric vein injury after the colonoscopy.

OUTCOMES: The patient did not complain of nausea or vomiting and was discharged after 43 days.

LESSONS: Although massive retroperitoneal hematoma is a minor complication after colonoscopy, it can be life threatening; thus, we need to know more about this complication. Dynamic CT may be useful in detecting whether the bleeding occurs from the artery or not.

Для цитирования: Ohtsuka Reo, Amano Hodaka, Niida Kei, Yoshino Takeaki, Owari Michiyo, Takano Ryotaro, Akama Yuichi, Watanabe Yohei, Iwao Toshiyasu. Massive retroperitoneal hematoma following colonoscopy: A case report.. Medicine. 2018. DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000011723.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.