MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1136/gutjnl-2017-314634

Медицинская библиотека · Gut · 2017

Covered TIPS versus endoscopic band ligation plus propranolol for the prevention of variceal rebleeding in cirrhotic patients with portal vein thrombosis: a randomised controlled trial.

Lv Yong, Qi Xingshun, He Chuangye, Wang Zhengyu, Yin Zhanxin, Niu Jing, Guo Wengang, Bai Wei, Zhang Hongbo, Xie Huahong, Yao Liping, Wang Jianhong, Li Tao, Wang Qiuhe, Chen Hui, Liu Haibo, Wang Enxing, Xia Dongdong, Luo Bohan, Li Xiaomei, Yuan Jie, Han Na, Zhu Ying, Xia Jielai, Cai Hongwei, Yang Zhiping, Wu Kaichun, Fan Daiming, Han Guohong, PVT-TIPS Study Group.

Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

Limited data are available on the prevention of variceal rebleeding in cirrhotic patients with portal vein thrombosis (PVT). This study aimed to compare transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) with covered stents versus endoscopic band ligation (EBL) plus propranolol for the prevention of variceal rebleeding among patients with cirrhosis and PVT.

DESIGN

Consecutive cirrhotic patients (94% Child-Pugh class A or B) with PVT who had variceal bleeding in the past 6 weeks were randomly assigned to TIPS group (n=24) or EBL plus propranolol group (EBL+drug, n=25), respectively. Primary endpoint was variceal rebleeding. Secondary endpoints included survival, overt hepatic encephalopathy (OHE), portal vein recanalisation and rethrombosis, other complications of portal hypertension and adverse events.

RESULTS

During a median follow-up of 30 months in both groups, variceal rebleeding was significantly less frequent in the TIPS group (15% vs 45% at 1 year and 25% vs 50% at 2 years, respectively; HR=0.28, 95% CI 0.10 to 0.76, p=0.008), with a significantly higher portal vein recanalisation rate (95% vs 70%; p=0.03) and a relatively lower rethrombosis rate (5% vs 33%; p=0.06) compared with the EBL+drug group. There were no statistically significant differences in survival (67% vs 84%; p=0.152), OHE (25% vs 16%; p=0.440), other complications of portal hypertension and adverse events between groups.

CONCLUSION

Covered TIPS placement in patients with PVT and moderately decompensated cirrhosis was more effective than EBL combined with propranolol for the prevention of rebleeding, with a higher probability of PVT resolution without increasing the risk of OHE and adverse effects, but this benefit did not translate into improved survival.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01326949.

Для цитирования: Lv Yong, Qi Xingshun, He Chuangye, Wang Zhengyu, Yin Zhanxin, Niu Jing, Guo Wengang, Bai Wei, Zhang Hongbo, Xie Huahong, Yao Liping, Wang Jianhong, Li Tao, Wang Qiuhe, Chen Hui, Liu Haibo, Wang Enxing, Xia Dongdong, Luo Bohan, Li Xiaomei, Yuan Jie, Han Na, Zhu Ying, Xia Jielai, Cai Hongwei, Yang Zhiping, Wu Kaichun, Fan Daiming, Han Guohong, PVT-TIPS Study Group.. Covered TIPS versus endoscopic band ligation plus propranolol for the prevention of variceal rebleeding in cirrhotic patients with portal vein thrombosis: a randomised controlled trial.. Gut. 2017. DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2017-314634.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.