DOI 10.1007/s00520-025-09669-2
Out-of-pocket medical costs in relation to resection of colorectal liver metastases in the Australian healthcare system.
Аннотация
PURPOSE: The cost of treating colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) places a financial burden on the healthcare system; however, there is limited research on the out-of-pocket (OOP) costs to patients. This study aimed to assess the direct medical OOP costs on patients who undergo liver resection for CRLM and evaluate their financial worry, stress, and difficulty.
METHODS
This was a retrospective cohort analysis of the OOP costs for patients who underwent potentially curative resection of CRLM in Sydney, Australia, between 2010 and June 2021. These costs were determined in Australian dollars from the diagnosis of liver metastases to their last follow-up. Patients completed a series of questions relating to financial worry, stress, and difficulty.
RESULTS
In total, 121 patients underwent liver resection, of which 85 were alive at a median follow-up of 5.3 years (1.8-13.7). There was a 59% response rate (50/85). Specialist consultation costs varied, with a median OOP cost of $393.35. Liver surgical treatment incurred the highest median OOP cost of $1011.29 (range $0-$7246.54). There were minimal OOP costs for chemotherapy and no OOP costs for radiation oncology. Most patients were not worried about the OOP costs (60%) and said there was no impact on their ability to make ends meet (64%) or had no effect on their finances (56%).
CONCLUSION
This study demonstrates that patients who undergo liver resection for CRLM and have long-term survival have moderate OOP costs. Most patients were not worried or stressed with the amount they had to pay OOP.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.