International journal of fertility and women's medicine · 2003
Evaluation of an indirect immunofluorescence assay for detecting Chlamydia trachomatis as a method for diagnosing tubal factor infertility in Mexican women.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Guerra-Infante Fernando M, Carballo-Perea Raul, Zamora-Ruiz Angélica, López-Hurtado Marcela, Flores-Medina Saúl, Contreras Gustavo Miranda
Аннотация
UNLABELLED: To evaluate the clinical impact of the use of an indirect immunofluorescence assay (IFA) against Chlamydia as a method to identify patients with tubal factor infertility (TFI) in a population of infertile Mexican women.
METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis made on 100 patients attending the infertility clinic who underwent laparoscopy. Blood and cervical samples were collected during the clinical examination. The presence of anti-Chlamydia trachomatis IgG antibodies was documented using the IFA test, and the presence of active chlamydial infection was evaluated using the nucleic acid hybridization assay.
RESULTS: The sensitivity and specificity values of the IFA test to identify patients with periadnexal adhesions were 45% and 82%, respectively; and the positive predictive and negative predictive values were 42% and 84%, and the positive and negative likelihood ratios were 2.5 and 0.7, respectively.
CONCLUSION: The IFA test was not usable for the identification of patients with periadnexal adhesions as a cause of infertility in this population. However, it could be useful as a screening test to decide which patients might receive laparoscopic treatment. Furthermore, it could be useful for identifying patients with active chlamydial infections in the upper genital tract, but a study with a larger sample needs to be done.
METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis made on 100 patients attending the infertility clinic who underwent laparoscopy. Blood and cervical samples were collected during the clinical examination. The presence of anti-Chlamydia trachomatis IgG antibodies was documented using the IFA test, and the presence of active chlamydial infection was evaluated using the nucleic acid hybridization assay.
RESULTS: The sensitivity and specificity values of the IFA test to identify patients with periadnexal adhesions were 45% and 82%, respectively; and the positive predictive and negative predictive values were 42% and 84%, and the positive and negative likelihood ratios were 2.5 and 0.7, respectively.
CONCLUSION: The IFA test was not usable for the identification of patients with periadnexal adhesions as a cause of infertility in this population. However, it could be useful as a screening test to decide which patients might receive laparoscopic treatment. Furthermore, it could be useful for identifying patients with active chlamydial infections in the upper genital tract, but a study with a larger sample needs to be done.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
AdolescentAdultAntibodies, BacterialChlamydia InfectionsChlamydia trachomatisFemaleFluorescent Antibody Technique, IndirectHumansImmunoglobulin GInfertility, FemaleLaparoscopyMexicoMiddle AgedNucleic Acid HybridizationPredictive Value of TestsRetrospective StudiesSalpingitisSensitivity and SpecificityUrethraWomen's Health