The American journal of emergency medicine · 2009
Board-certified emergency physicians' treatment of skin and soft tissue infections in the community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus era.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
LoVecchio Frank, Perera Nicholas, Casanova Lora, Mulrow Mary, Pohl Angela
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Emergency physicians commonly treat skin and soft tissue infections. Community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (CA-MRSA) has become the prominent etiologic agent in these infections. The CA-MRSA is resistant to many antibiotics traditionally used to treat skin and soft tissue infections.
STUDY OBJECTIVES: We aim to identify how the increased prevalence of CA-MRSA has changed emergency medicine physician (EMP) prescribing and treatment practices for community-acquired skin and soft tissue infections.
METHODS: The EMPs in the United States were surveyed between June and December of 2006. Two cases of skin and soft tissue infection were presented, and questions were asked about management.
RESULTS: Two hundred seventy-five surveys were returned. The EMPs used a variety of approaches in the antibiotic treatment of skin and soft tissue infections. Two hundred seven (75.3%) of 275 were board-certified EMPs and were included in the analysis. Commonly used agents for outpatient treatment include trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole, clindamycin, cephalexin, rifampin, and tetracyclines. For patients requiring admission, 60% of providers would include vancomycin in their treatment regimen.
CONCLUSION: Many clinicians have changed their practice patterns to include antibiotics that usually display activity against CA-MRSA. However, cephalexin remains a popular agent used for these infections.
STUDY OBJECTIVES: We aim to identify how the increased prevalence of CA-MRSA has changed emergency medicine physician (EMP) prescribing and treatment practices for community-acquired skin and soft tissue infections.
METHODS: The EMPs in the United States were surveyed between June and December of 2006. Two cases of skin and soft tissue infection were presented, and questions were asked about management.
RESULTS: Two hundred seventy-five surveys were returned. The EMPs used a variety of approaches in the antibiotic treatment of skin and soft tissue infections. Two hundred seven (75.3%) of 275 were board-certified EMPs and were included in the analysis. Commonly used agents for outpatient treatment include trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole, clindamycin, cephalexin, rifampin, and tetracyclines. For patients requiring admission, 60% of providers would include vancomycin in their treatment regimen.
CONCLUSION: Many clinicians have changed their practice patterns to include antibiotics that usually display activity against CA-MRSA. However, cephalexin remains a popular agent used for these infections.