Heart rhythm · 2024
ECG-only explainable deep learning algorithm predicts the risk for malignant ventricular arrhythmia in phospholamban cardiomyopathy.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
van de Leur Rutger R, de Brouwer Remco, Bleijendaal Hidde, Verstraelen Tom E, Mahmoud Belend, Perez-Matos Ana, Dickhoff Cathelijne, Schoonderwoerd Bas A, Germans Tjeerd, Houweling Arjan, van der Zwaag Paul A, Cox Moniek G P J, Peter van Tintelen J, Te Riele Anneline S J M, van den Berg Maarten P, Wilde Arthur A M, Doevendans Pieter A, de Boer Rudolf A, van Es René
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Phospholamban (PLN) p.(Arg14del) variant carriers are at risk for development of malignant ventricular arrhythmia (MVA). Accurate risk stratification allows timely implantation of intracardiac defibrillators and is currently performed with a multimodality prediction model.
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate whether an explainable deep learning-based approach allows risk prediction with only electrocardiogram (ECG) data.
METHODS: A total of 679 PLN p.(Arg14del) carriers without MVA at baseline were identified. A deep learning-based variational auto-encoder, trained on 1.1 million ECGs, was used to convert the 12-lead baseline ECG into its FactorECG, a compressed version of the ECG that summarizes it into 32 explainable factors. Prediction models were developed by Cox regression.
RESULTS: The deep learning-based ECG-only approach was able to predict MVA with a C statistic of 0.79 (95% CI, 0.76-0.83), comparable to the current prediction model (C statistic, 0.83 [95% CI, 0.79-0.88]; P = .054) and outperforming a model based on conventional ECG parameters (low-voltage ECG and negative T waves; C statistic, 0.65 [95% CI, 0.58-0.73]; P < .001). Clinical simulations showed that a 2-step approach, with ECG-only screening followed by a full workup, resulted in 60% less additional diagnostics while outperforming the multimodal prediction model in all patients. A visualization tool was created to provide interactive visualizations (https://pln.ecgx.ai).
CONCLUSION: Our deep learning-based algorithm based on ECG data only accurately predicts the occurrence of MVA in PLN p.(Arg14del) carriers, enabling more efficient stratification of patients who need additional diagnostic testing and follow-up.
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate whether an explainable deep learning-based approach allows risk prediction with only electrocardiogram (ECG) data.
METHODS: A total of 679 PLN p.(Arg14del) carriers without MVA at baseline were identified. A deep learning-based variational auto-encoder, trained on 1.1 million ECGs, was used to convert the 12-lead baseline ECG into its FactorECG, a compressed version of the ECG that summarizes it into 32 explainable factors. Prediction models were developed by Cox regression.
RESULTS: The deep learning-based ECG-only approach was able to predict MVA with a C statistic of 0.79 (95% CI, 0.76-0.83), comparable to the current prediction model (C statistic, 0.83 [95% CI, 0.79-0.88]; P = .054) and outperforming a model based on conventional ECG parameters (low-voltage ECG and negative T waves; C statistic, 0.65 [95% CI, 0.58-0.73]; P < .001). Clinical simulations showed that a 2-step approach, with ECG-only screening followed by a full workup, resulted in 60% less additional diagnostics while outperforming the multimodal prediction model in all patients. A visualization tool was created to provide interactive visualizations (https://pln.ecgx.ai).
CONCLUSION: Our deep learning-based algorithm based on ECG data only accurately predicts the occurrence of MVA in PLN p.(Arg14del) carriers, enabling more efficient stratification of patients who need additional diagnostic testing and follow-up.