MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2010.02.055

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of the American College of Surgeons · 2010

Financial impact of surgical site infection after kidney transplantation: implications for quality improvement initiative design.

Ho Dorothy, Lynch Raymond J, Ranney David N, Magar Avedis, Kubus Jim, Englesbe Michael J

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Surgical site infection (SSI) after kidney transplantation has been associated with worse graft and patient survival. Although there are clinical incentives to reduce the incidence of SSI, it is unknown whether these are aligned with financial incentives for payers and providers. We use post-kidney transplant surgical site infection (SSI) to quantify the financial implications of surgical complications. The goal of this study was to quantify the financial costs of SSI after kidney transplantation and to determine the party bearing the brunt of these costs.

STUDY

DESIGN

This was a retrospective cohort study of all adult, first-time kidney-only transplant recipients at the University of Michigan Health System from September 2003 to April 2008 (n = 869). The primary exposure variable was SSI. SSI was defined as skin dehiscence, fascial dehiscence, or bowel evisceration. Primary outcomes measures were hospital revenue (payer costs), hospital inpatient costs, and hospital margin. We used simple univariate (t-test) analysis and multivariate (generalized linear regression) models to control for donor, recipient, and insurer characteristics.

RESULTS

Eighteen percent of patients had documented SSIs. In cases with an SSI hospital revenue increased by $20,176, hospital margin decreased by $4,278, and hospital costs increased by $24,454. When adjusted for donor and recipient characteristics, SSI was independently associated with an $11,132 increase in hospital revenue.

CONCLUSIONS

Although SSIs have negative financial effects on both hospitals and payers, the impact is greater on payers. Payers have the primary financial incentive to reduce SSI, and broad-based, quality improvement initiatives can be prudent investments for payers. Quantification of the costs associated with SSI can be used to define financial parameters for such initiatives that might prove beneficial to multiple stakeholders.

Для цитирования: Ho Dorothy, Lynch Raymond J, Ranney David N, Magar Avedis, Kubus Jim, Englesbe Michael J. Financial impact of surgical site infection after kidney transplantation: implications for quality improvement initiative design.. Journal of the American College of Surgeons. 2010. DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2010.02.055.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.