A multidisciplinary approach and consensus statement to establish standards of care for Angelman syndrome.
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Duis Jessica, Nespeca Mark, Summers Jane, Bird Lynne, Bindels-de Heus Karen G C B, Valstar M J, de Wit Marie-Claire Y, Navis C, Ten Hooven-Radstaake Maartje, van Iperen-Kolk Bianca M, Ernst Susan, Dendrinos Melina, Katz Terry, Diaz-Medina Gloria, Katyayan Akshat, Nangia Srishti, Thibert Ronald, Glaze Daniel, Keary Christopher, Pelc Karine, Simon Nicole, Sadhwani Anjali, Heussler Helen, Wheeler Anne, Woeber Caroline, DeRamus Margaret, Thomas Amy, Kertcher Emily, DeValk Lauren, Kalemeris Kristen, Arps Kara, Baym Carol, Harris Nicole, Gorham John P, Bohnsack Brenda L, Chambers Reid C, Harris Sarah, Chambers Henry G, Okoniewski Katherine, Jalazo Elizabeth R, Berent Allyson, Bacino Carlos A, Williams Charles, Anderson Anne
Аннотация
METHODS: We compiled the key recognized clinical features of AS based on consensus from a team of specialists managing patients with AS. Working groups were established to address each focus area with committees comprised of providers who manage >5 individuals. Committees developed management guidelines for their area of expertise. These were compiled into a final document to provide a framework for standardizing management. Evidence from the medical literature was also comprehensively reviewed.
RESULTS: Areas covered by working groups in the consensus document include genetics, developmental medicine, psychology, general health concerns, neurology (including movement disorders), sleep, psychiatry, orthopedics, ophthalmology, communication, early intervention and therapies, and caregiver health. Working groups created frameworks, including flowcharts and tables, to help with quick access for providers. Data from the literature were incorporated to ensure providers had review of experiential versus evidence-based care guidelines.
CONCLUSION: Standards of care in the management of AS are keys to ensure optimal care at a critical time when new disease-modifying therapies are emerging. This document is a framework for providers of all familiarity levels.