The Laryngoscope · 2005
Endoscopic management of extruding medialization laryngoplasty implants.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Halum Stacey L, Postma Gregory N, Koufman Jamie A
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Medialization laryngoplasty (ML) is a commonly performed procedure for vocal fold motion impairment with glottic incompetence. Although implant extrusion is a well-known risk of ML, management of this complication is rarely mentioned in the literature. The aim of this study was to review our experience with endoscopic implant retrieval for a group of patients with extruding ML implants.
METHODS: All patients identified in our institution from January 1989 through August 2004 with a history of ML and extruded implants were identified. Case management was reviewed, including information on presentation, management techniques, and outcomes.
RESULTS: Five patients presented with extruding ML (Gore-Tex [n = 2] or silastic [n = 3]) implants. All patients presented with worsening dysphonia and evidence of fullness and/or granulation tissue at the extrusion site. Endoscopic removal was performed using either sharp dissection or CO2 laser dissection. After removal, four patients underwent vocal fold injection augmentation.
CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopic removal appears to be a safe, effective, and even preferred alternative to external transcervical removal in selected cases of extruding implants.
METHODS: All patients identified in our institution from January 1989 through August 2004 with a history of ML and extruded implants were identified. Case management was reviewed, including information on presentation, management techniques, and outcomes.
RESULTS: Five patients presented with extruding ML (Gore-Tex [n = 2] or silastic [n = 3]) implants. All patients presented with worsening dysphonia and evidence of fullness and/or granulation tissue at the extrusion site. Endoscopic removal was performed using either sharp dissection or CO2 laser dissection. After removal, four patients underwent vocal fold injection augmentation.
CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopic removal appears to be a safe, effective, and even preferred alternative to external transcervical removal in selected cases of extruding implants.