MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1097/01.mlg.0000163342.10412.eb

Медицинская библиотека · The Laryngoscope · 2005

Endoscopic management of extruding medialization laryngoplasty implants.

Halum Stacey L, Postma Gregory N, Koufman Jamie A

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Medialization laryngoplasty (ML) is a commonly performed procedure for vocal fold motion impairment with glottic incompetence. Although implant extrusion is a well-known risk of ML, management of this complication is rarely mentioned in the literature. The aim of this study was to review our experience with endoscopic implant retrieval for a group of patients with extruding ML implants.

METHODS

All patients identified in our institution from January 1989 through August 2004 with a history of ML and extruded implants were identified. Case management was reviewed, including information on presentation, management techniques, and outcomes.

RESULTS

Five patients presented with extruding ML (Gore-Tex [n = 2] or silastic [n = 3]) implants. All patients presented with worsening dysphonia and evidence of fullness and/or granulation tissue at the extrusion site. Endoscopic removal was performed using either sharp dissection or CO2 laser dissection. After removal, four patients underwent vocal fold injection augmentation.

CONCLUSIONS

Endoscopic removal appears to be a safe, effective, and even preferred alternative to external transcervical removal in selected cases of extruding implants.

Для цитирования: Halum Stacey L, Postma Gregory N, Koufman Jamie A. Endoscopic management of extruding medialization laryngoplasty implants.. The Laryngoscope. 2005. DOI: 10.1097/01.mlg.0000163342.10412.eb.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.