MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1590/s0080-62342011000100039

Медицинская библиотека · Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da U S P · 2011

[Prevention strategies for testicular and penile cancer: an integrative review].

de Souza Kelly Wanessa, dos Reis Paula Elaine Diniz, Gomes Isabelle Pimentel, de Carvalho Emília Campos

Аннотация на английскомСтатьяОбзорПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

Testicular and penile cancers are genital disorders that affect a small part of population, but are generally aggressive mainly because of the dramatic psychological effect they impose over patients. The purpose of this study was to identify evidence concerning preventing strategies for the referred types of cancer. An integrative literature review was performed on the COCHRANE, PubMed/MEDLINE, LILACS, BDENF and CINAHL databases using the following controlled descriptors: health promotion, risk factors, primary prevention, and urogenital neoplasms; and uncontrolled descriptors: prevention, penile cancer, testicle cancer. The studies were unanimous in concluding that self-examination of testicles is the best way to identify a possible event of testicular cancer. Circumcision, prevention for sexual transmission diseases and adequate hygiene were the most important manners for penile cancer prevention. Nurses should assume the role for general and specific health promotion, considering the major impact it would have for prevention of diseases, especially for the urogenital cancers studied in this review.

Для цитирования: de Souza Kelly Wanessa, dos Reis Paula Elaine Diniz, Gomes Isabelle Pimentel, de Carvalho Emília Campos. [Prevention strategies for testicular and penile cancer: an integrative review].. Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da U S P. 2011. DOI: 10.1590/s0080-62342011000100039.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.