MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций
Медицинская библиотека · No shinkei geka. Neurological surgery · 2010

[Clinical application of the Colorado-microdissection needle in neurosurgery].

Baba Shiro, Matsuo Takayuki, Ushijima Ryujiro, Yano Hiroki, Suyama Kazuhiko, Nagata Izumi

Сравнительное исследованиеАннотация на английскомСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

The steel scalpel and scalp clips have been commonly used for scalp incision in many neurosurgical procedures. Electrocautery is used mainly for subcutaneous and deep-layer dissection. The use of electrocautery on scalp incision has been avoided because of possible adverse events such as wound dehiscence and infection. We report our experience in Colorado-microdissection needle electrocautery for scalp incisions performed in our institution between November, 2006 and March, 2009. The rate of wound infection was compared in patients using the microdissection needle (100 procedures, n=93) and those using the steel scalpel/clips (n=261) during the same period. In patients using the microdissection needle, wound healing delay was not observed. Wound infection developed in only one procedure (1.0%) with the microdissection needle, and it developed in 6 procedures (2.2%) with the steel scalpel/clips, although this did not reach statistical significance (p=0.34). The use of electrocautery tended to cause little tissue distortion during fine dissection and it reduced blood loss. In conclusion, Colorado-microdissection needle electrocautery for scalp incisions could be safe and quite useful in neurosurgical procedures.

Для цитирования: Baba Shiro, Matsuo Takayuki, Ushijima Ryujiro, Yano Hiroki, Suyama Kazuhiko, Nagata Izumi. [Clinical application of the Colorado-microdissection needle in neurosurgery].. No shinkei geka. Neurological surgery. 2010.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.