The journal of trauma and acute care surgery · 2013
Non-spinal-associated injuries with lumbar transverse process fractures: influence of segments, amount, and concomitant vertebral fractures.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Xia Tian, Tian Ji-Wei, Dong Shuang-Hai, Wang Lei, Zhao Qing-Hua
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Lumbar transverse process fractures (LTPFs) are often with concomitant non-spinal-associated injuries (NSAIs). The purpose of this study was to analyze the correlation between the NSAIs and the LTPFs of different segments, amount, and concomitant thoracolumbar/lumbar vertebral fractures.
METHODS: A total of 1,181 patients with LTPFs or thoracolumbar/lumbar vertebral fractures were chosen between September 2006 and June 2010. The patients were divided into three groups: thoracolumbar/lumbar vertebral fractures without LTPFs, with associated LTPFs, and isolated LTPFs (iLTPFs). The correlation of the NSAIs of different sites and the LTPFs of different segments, amount, and concomitant thoracolumbar/lumbar vertebral fractures were analyzed between and within groups by χ test and logistic regression analysis.
RESULTS: The incidence of NSAIs with iLTPFs and aLTFP groups were significantly higher than that of vertebral fractures without LTPF group (55.73% and 64.49% vs. 21.32%, respectively, p = 0.000). However, the incidence was not significantly different between the iLTPFs and the aLTFP groups (p = 0.106). The results with NSAIs of different sites were almost the same. L5TPFs were a stronger risk factor to NSAIs (relative risk [RR] = 15.72; 95% confidence interval [CI], 4.47-55.37; p = 0.000) in the iLTPF group (RR = 21.92; 95% CI, 6.68-71.92; p = 0.000) and in the vertebral fractures with associated LTPF group (RR = 9.42; 95% CI, 1.19-74.72; p = 0.034). L5TPFs were also a very important risk factor for pelvic injuries (RR = 46.10; 95% CI, 22.40-94.88; p = 0.000); 65.1% in L5iTPFs were accompanied with Tile-C pelvic injuries, slightly higher than in L5aTPFs (46.7%). L4TPFs were a risk factor to abdominal injuries within iLTPFs (RR = 2.27; 95% CI, 1.23-4.20; p = 0.009).
CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of NSAIs is very high in cases with LTPFs, particularly with L5TPFs. A detailed investigation should be performed to search for NSAIs once LTPFs are identified so that appropriate treatment can be initiated.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.
METHODS: A total of 1,181 patients with LTPFs or thoracolumbar/lumbar vertebral fractures were chosen between September 2006 and June 2010. The patients were divided into three groups: thoracolumbar/lumbar vertebral fractures without LTPFs, with associated LTPFs, and isolated LTPFs (iLTPFs). The correlation of the NSAIs of different sites and the LTPFs of different segments, amount, and concomitant thoracolumbar/lumbar vertebral fractures were analyzed between and within groups by χ test and logistic regression analysis.
RESULTS: The incidence of NSAIs with iLTPFs and aLTFP groups were significantly higher than that of vertebral fractures without LTPF group (55.73% and 64.49% vs. 21.32%, respectively, p = 0.000). However, the incidence was not significantly different between the iLTPFs and the aLTFP groups (p = 0.106). The results with NSAIs of different sites were almost the same. L5TPFs were a stronger risk factor to NSAIs (relative risk [RR] = 15.72; 95% confidence interval [CI], 4.47-55.37; p = 0.000) in the iLTPF group (RR = 21.92; 95% CI, 6.68-71.92; p = 0.000) and in the vertebral fractures with associated LTPF group (RR = 9.42; 95% CI, 1.19-74.72; p = 0.034). L5TPFs were also a very important risk factor for pelvic injuries (RR = 46.10; 95% CI, 22.40-94.88; p = 0.000); 65.1% in L5iTPFs were accompanied with Tile-C pelvic injuries, slightly higher than in L5aTPFs (46.7%). L4TPFs were a risk factor to abdominal injuries within iLTPFs (RR = 2.27; 95% CI, 1.23-4.20; p = 0.009).
CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of NSAIs is very high in cases with LTPFs, particularly with L5TPFs. A detailed investigation should be performed to search for NSAIs once LTPFs are identified so that appropriate treatment can be initiated.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.