European journal of anaesthesiology · 2019
Comparison of a simplified nasal continuous positive airways pressure device with nasal cannula in obese patients undergoing colonoscopy during deep sedation: A randomised clinical trial.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Bai Yiping, Xu Zeping, Chandrashekar Meera, St Jacques Paul J, Liang Yafen, Jiang Yandong, Kla Koffi
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Continuous positive airways pressure (CPAP) with a CPAP machine and mask has been shown to be more effective at minimising hypoxaemia than other devices under deep sedation. However, the efficacy of a new and simple CPAP device for spontaneously breathing obese patients during colonoscopy is unknown.
OBJECTIVE: We hypothesised that oxygenation and ventilation in obese patients under deep sedation during colonoscopy using CPAP via a new nasal mask (SuperNO2VA) would be better than routine care with oxygen supplementation via a nasal cannula.
DESIGN: Randomised study.
SETTING: Single-centre, June 2017 to October 2017.
PATIENTS: A total of 174 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to Mask group or Control group. Thirty-eight patients were excluded and data from 136 patients underwent final analysis.
INTERVENTION: Patients in the Mask group were provided with nasal CPAP (10 cmH2O) at an oxygen flow rate of 15 l min. In the Control group, patients were given oxygen via a nasal cannula at a flow rate of 5 l min.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was elapsed time from anaesthesia induction to the first airway intervention.
RESULTS: The elapsed time from anaesthesia induction to the first airway intervention was 19 ± 10 min in the Mask group (n=63) vs. 10 ± 12 min in the Control group (n=73, P < 0.001). In all, 87.5% (56/64) of patients achieved the target CPAP value. More patients in the Control group (63%) received airway intervention than in the Mask group (22%) (P < 0.001). Hypoxaemia (pulse oximeter oxygen saturation, SpO2 < 90%) occurred more frequently in the Control group (22%) than in the Mask group (5%) (P = 0.004). Minute ventilationPostinduction/minute ventilationBaseline and minute ventilationProcedure-end/minute ventilationBaseline was lower in the Control group than in the Mask group (P = 0.007 and 0.001, respectively).
CONCLUSION: Application of a nasal mask at a target CPAP of 10 cmH2O improves ventilation and decreases the frequency and severity of hypoxaemia.
TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT03139448, registered at ClinicalTrials.gov.
OBJECTIVE: We hypothesised that oxygenation and ventilation in obese patients under deep sedation during colonoscopy using CPAP via a new nasal mask (SuperNO2VA) would be better than routine care with oxygen supplementation via a nasal cannula.
DESIGN: Randomised study.
SETTING: Single-centre, June 2017 to October 2017.
PATIENTS: A total of 174 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to Mask group or Control group. Thirty-eight patients were excluded and data from 136 patients underwent final analysis.
INTERVENTION: Patients in the Mask group were provided with nasal CPAP (10 cmH2O) at an oxygen flow rate of 15 l min. In the Control group, patients were given oxygen via a nasal cannula at a flow rate of 5 l min.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was elapsed time from anaesthesia induction to the first airway intervention.
RESULTS: The elapsed time from anaesthesia induction to the first airway intervention was 19 ± 10 min in the Mask group (n=63) vs. 10 ± 12 min in the Control group (n=73, P < 0.001). In all, 87.5% (56/64) of patients achieved the target CPAP value. More patients in the Control group (63%) received airway intervention than in the Mask group (22%) (P < 0.001). Hypoxaemia (pulse oximeter oxygen saturation, SpO2 < 90%) occurred more frequently in the Control group (22%) than in the Mask group (5%) (P = 0.004). Minute ventilationPostinduction/minute ventilationBaseline and minute ventilationProcedure-end/minute ventilationBaseline was lower in the Control group than in the Mask group (P = 0.007 and 0.001, respectively).
CONCLUSION: Application of a nasal mask at a target CPAP of 10 cmH2O improves ventilation and decreases the frequency and severity of hypoxaemia.
TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT03139448, registered at ClinicalTrials.gov.