MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1038/s43018-026-01127-0

Медицинская библиотека · Nature cancer · 2026

Diagnostic accuracy, fairness and clinical implementation of AI for breast cancer screening: results of multicenter retrospective and prospective technical feasibility studies.

Kelly Christopher J, Wilson Marc, Warren Lucy M, Sidebottom Richard, Halling-Brown Mark, Yang Lin, Morigami Megumi, Venton Jenny, Chopra Reena, Chang Jane, Dixon Jonathan, Gilbert Fiona J, Golden Daniel I, Gruzewska Elzbieta, Honeyfield Lesley, Hujan Amandeep, Khodabakhshi Delara, Lewis Emma, Malhotra Namrata, Mallya Rachita, Ogunleye Della, Purdy Charlotte, Sayres Rory, Sieniek Marcin, Stoycheva Tsvetina, Sy Aminata, Thomas Susan, Ward Dominic, Xi Lihong, Xu Shawn, Shetty Shravya, Darzi Ara, Young Kenneth, Purushothaman Hema, Khoo Lisanne, Reddy Mamatha, Ashrafian Hutan, Cunningham Deborah

СтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

Artificial intelligence (AI) promises to enhance breast cancer screening. Here we evaluated Google's mammography AI system (version 1.2) across two phases: a retrospective study using 115,973 mammograms from five National Health Service screening services with 39-month follow-up and prospective noninterventional feasibility deployment at 12 sites (9,266 cases). The primary endpoint was AI sensitivity and specificity versus first reader using a 5% noninferiority margin. The secondary endpoints were performance versus second or consensus readers and breast-level analyses. Retrospectively, AI achieved superior sensitivity (0.541 versus 0.437 for first reader, P < 0.001) and noninferior specificity (0.943 versus 0.952, P < 0.001). Cancer detection rate increased from 7.54 to 9.33 per 1,000 women, with AI detecting 25.0% of interval cancers. Performance was particularly strong for first screens (39.3% fewer recalls, 8.8% higher detection) and invasive cancers. No systematic demographic disparities were observed. Simulated second-reader replacement reduced reading time by 32% while increasing detection by 17.7%. Prospective deployment confirmed technical feasibility but revealed a distribution shift requiring threshold recalibration. Implementation requires adaptive calibration and continuous monitoring to ensure safety and equity.

Для цитирования: Kelly Christopher J, Wilson Marc, Warren Lucy M, Sidebottom Richard, Halling-Brown Mark, Yang Lin, Morigami Megumi, Venton Jenny, Chopra Reena, Chang Jane, Dixon Jonathan, Gilbert Fiona J, Golden Daniel I, Gruzewska Elzbieta, Honeyfield Lesley, Hujan Amandeep, Khodabakhshi Delara, Lewis Emma, Malhotra Namrata, Mallya Rachita, Ogunleye Della, Purdy Charlotte, Sayres Rory, Sieniek Marcin, Stoycheva Tsvetina, Sy Aminata, Thomas Susan, Ward Dominic, Xi Lihong, Xu Shawn, Shetty Shravya, Darzi Ara, Young Kenneth, Purushothaman Hema, Khoo Lisanne, Reddy Mamatha, Ashrafian Hutan, Cunningham Deborah. Diagnostic accuracy, fairness and clinical implementation of AI for breast cancer screening: results of multicenter retrospective and prospective technical feasibility studies.. Nature cancer. 2026. DOI: 10.1038/s43018-026-01127-0.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.