MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1007/bf00497811

Медицинская библиотека · Pediatric surgery international · 2013

Semen quality and gonadotropin levels in patients operated upon for cryptorchidism.

Mayr J, Pusch H H, Schimpl G, Reitinger T, Sorantin E, Mayr-Koci M

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

In a long-term follow-up study we compared preoperative testicular position, age at orchiopexy, and morphology of testicular biopsies investigated at orchiopexy to sperm analysis results, testicular volume, and serum follicle-stimulating hormone and luteinizing hormone levels at follow-up in 46 men with a history of surgical correction of cryptorchidism in childhood. They had undergone orchiopexy at age 1.5-12.0 years, 24 for unilateral and 22 for bilateral cryptorchidism. Eleven (46%) of the 24 patients with unilateral and 7 (32%) of the 22 with bilateral undescended testes had a normal sperm analysis, whereas in men with impaired spermiogenesis oligo-asthenozoospermia was the predominant feature. Three (13.6%) patients with bilateral cryptorchidism showed azoospermia, but none of the patients with unilateral cryptorchidism did. Neither the age at orchiopexy nor the average germ-cell count per cross-sectioned seminiferous tubule of testicular biopsies examined at orchiopexy correlated significantly with subsequent sperm analysis results or gonadotropin levels at follow-up. The pretreatment testicular position ("testicular position value") has a high prognostic value for prediction of subsequent sperm analysis results and serum gonadotropin levels.

Для цитирования: Mayr J, Pusch H H, Schimpl G, Reitinger T, Sorantin E, Mayr-Koci M. Semen quality and gonadotropin levels in patients operated upon for cryptorchidism.. Pediatric surgery international. 2013. DOI: 10.1007/bf00497811.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.