Journal of periodontology · 2010
Immediate loading of a dental implant placed in fresh socket with acute dehiscence-type defect: a clinical case report.
Клинический случайСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Villa Roberto, Crespi Roberto, Capparè Paolo, Gherlone Enrico
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: The aim of the present clinical case is to show buccal bone repair around a dental implant placed by flapless technique and immediately loaded in fresh socket with acute buccal dehiscence-type defect.
METHODS: A 58-year-old female presented with a fistula on the buccal side and a root fracture at the left lateral incisive. The dental extraction was performed without mucogingival flap elevation; the absence of buccal bone plate was recorded. A screw-shaped implant was placed. Immediately after the surgical procedure, the patient received temporary prosthetic restoration, and 3 months later definitive metal-ceramic restoration was positioned.
RESULTS: Four years later, a fracture of the crown and gingival inflammatory process were observed. The crown was removed and a fracture of the zirconia abutment was reported. Surgical reentry was performed, gingival flap was raised, and buccal bone repair was observed.
CONCLUSION: Biologically, it is very difficult to explain the bone repair process around implants in the acute dehiscence-type defect, and only biologic speculations explain the outcome of this clinical result.
METHODS: A 58-year-old female presented with a fistula on the buccal side and a root fracture at the left lateral incisive. The dental extraction was performed without mucogingival flap elevation; the absence of buccal bone plate was recorded. A screw-shaped implant was placed. Immediately after the surgical procedure, the patient received temporary prosthetic restoration, and 3 months later definitive metal-ceramic restoration was positioned.
RESULTS: Four years later, a fracture of the crown and gingival inflammatory process were observed. The crown was removed and a fracture of the zirconia abutment was reported. Surgical reentry was performed, gingival flap was raised, and buccal bone repair was observed.
CONCLUSION: Biologically, it is very difficult to explain the bone repair process around implants in the acute dehiscence-type defect, and only biologic speculations explain the outcome of this clinical result.