Predictors and outcome of electrical storm-induced cardiogenic shock.

AIM: Limited information is available about the short- and long-term outcomes in electrical storm (ES)-induced cardiogenic shock (CS) and its predictors.

METHODS AND

RESULTS

This is a retrospective, single-centre cohort study of consecutive patients with ES admitted to the Cardiac Intensive Care Unit between 2015 and 2020. The proportion of ES patients who developed CS was adjudicated, and clinical predictors of in-hospital ventricular arrhythmia (VA)-related mortality and 1-year all-cause mortality were investigated. Of the 214 patients with ES, 33.6% developed CS. Left-ventricular ejection fraction, admission lactate, absence of an implantable cardioverter defibrillator, and admission central venous pressure were independently associated with development of CS (P < 0.03 for all). Based on these variables, a FLIC score was developed (https://riskcalc.org/FLICscore/) to predict ES-induced CS [area under the curve (AUC) = 0.949, with AUC = 0.954 in a validation cohort, both P < 0.001]. Patients who developed CS had a 11.3-fold [95% confidence interval (CI) 2.7-12.8] increased odds for in-hospital VA-related mortality and 9.4-fold (95% CI 4.0-22.4) increased odds for in-hospital all-cause mortality. A FLIC score above 0.62 was associated with a 6.2- and 5.8-fold increased odds for respectively similar endpoints. Patients with ES-induced CS received more treatment modalities to manage the ES (4.5 ± 1.8 vs. 2.3 ± 1.2, P < 0.001) and had longer length of stay [14 (8-27) vs. 8 (5-13), P < 0.001] than patients without CS. Interestingly, if patients with ES-induced CS survived to discharge, their outcomes were similar to those without CS at 1 year.

CONCLUSION

Cardiogenic shock in ES is a frequent and potentially life-threatening complication with high short-term mortality. A novel risk score could identify patient at risk, generating a potential for early risk-based interventions.