Journal of global antimicrobial resistance · 2018
Comparison between disk diffusion and agar dilution methods to determine in vitro susceptibility of Corynebacterium spp. clinical isolates and update of their susceptibility.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Barberis Claudia M, Sandoval Eugenia, Rodriguez Carlos Hernán, Ramírez María Soledad, Famiglietti Angela, Almuzara Marisa, Vay Carlos
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: Although Corynebacterium spp. are part of the microbiota of the skin and mucous membranes, human infections caused by Corynebacterium spp. have been reported and the multidrug resistance pattern of the recovered isolates was emphasised. Due to the usefulness of disk diffusion in daily practice, the purpose of this study was to compare disk diffusion with agar dilution to determine disk diffusion breakpoints and to review the antimicrobial susceptibility of the most frequent Corynebacterium spp. isolated in clinical samples.
METHODS: Susceptibility to 20 antimicrobial agents of 143 Corynebacterium spp. isolates recovered from relevant clinical samples was determined. Comparison between the disk diffusion and agar dilution methods for eight antimicrobial agents was performed to establish new breakpoints using simple linear regression analysis.
RESULTS: All of the isolates tested were susceptible to vancomycin, minocycline and linezolid. A typical susceptibility profile to β-lactam antibiotics among the different species included was not observed. Almost all isolates showed resistance to macrolides and lincosamides. Using a simple linear regression method, it was possible to establish breakpoints for penicillin, erythromycin, clindamycin, gentamicin and ciprofloxacin. However, the low correlation coefficient obtained for vancomycin, minocycline and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole did not allow establishment of breakpoints for the disk diffusion method.
CONCLUSION: The disk diffusion method could only be used to evaluate susceptibility to penicillin, erythromycin, clindamycin, gentamicin and ciprofloxacin. These data show that the presence of a Corynebacterium spp. isolate in a clinical sample demands the performance of antimicrobial susceptibility testing since the susceptibility profile is not predictable.
METHODS: Susceptibility to 20 antimicrobial agents of 143 Corynebacterium spp. isolates recovered from relevant clinical samples was determined. Comparison between the disk diffusion and agar dilution methods for eight antimicrobial agents was performed to establish new breakpoints using simple linear regression analysis.
RESULTS: All of the isolates tested were susceptible to vancomycin, minocycline and linezolid. A typical susceptibility profile to β-lactam antibiotics among the different species included was not observed. Almost all isolates showed resistance to macrolides and lincosamides. Using a simple linear regression method, it was possible to establish breakpoints for penicillin, erythromycin, clindamycin, gentamicin and ciprofloxacin. However, the low correlation coefficient obtained for vancomycin, minocycline and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole did not allow establishment of breakpoints for the disk diffusion method.
CONCLUSION: The disk diffusion method could only be used to evaluate susceptibility to penicillin, erythromycin, clindamycin, gentamicin and ciprofloxacin. These data show that the presence of a Corynebacterium spp. isolate in a clinical sample demands the performance of antimicrobial susceptibility testing since the susceptibility profile is not predictable.