MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1097/00006123-199810000-00144

Медицинская библиотека · Neurosurgery · 1998

Reversibility of severe sagittal sinus thrombosis with open surgical thrombectomy combined with local infusion of tissue plasminogen activator: technical case report.

Ekseth K, Boström S, Vegfors M

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

To explore the controversial issue of anticoagulant therapy and indications for surgery in association with severe sinus thrombosis.

METHODS

During the last 4 years, we have treated three patients with severe sinus thrombosis of the dural sinuses. All three patients received systemic anticoagulant therapy and, after experiencing neurological deterioration, underwent open thrombectomy and local thrombolysis. After the operation, aggressive intensive care was given and included cerebral perfusion monitoring, barbiturate administration, hyperventilation, and osmotherapy. The treatment was guided by repeated neuroradiological investigations.

RESULTS

All three patients returned to their normal lives.

CONCLUSION

Intracranial sinus thrombosis, even in the worst neurological state, should be treated aggressively. A cornerstone in treatment is systemic anticoagulant therapy and repeated neuroradiological studies. When, despite adequate anticoagulant therapy and intensive care, neurological deterioration occurs, a combination of open thrombectomy and local thrombolytic therapy should be considered.

Для цитирования: Ekseth K, Boström S, Vegfors M. Reversibility of severe sagittal sinus thrombosis with open surgical thrombectomy combined with local infusion of tissue plasminogen activator: technical case report.. Neurosurgery. 1998. DOI: 10.1097/00006123-199810000-00144.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.