MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций
Медицинская библиотека · The Journal of reproductive medicine · 2010

Microtubal reanastomosis: success rates as compared to in vitro fertilization.

Hirth Ronald, Zbella Edward, Sanchez Mark, Prieto Jose

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

To determine the pregnancy rates of microtubal reanastomosis (MTR) and any associated clinical variables, to determine pregnancy rates and live birth rates of MTR as compared to in vitro fertilization (IVF) and to study the rates of ectopic pregnancy and spontaneous abortion (SAB) after MTR.

STUDY

DESIGN

Retrospective chart review.

RESULTS

At our institution, the pregnancy rate in the first 12 months following MTR was 44.3%. The study also showed that 2 clinical variables of the MTR procedure that had higher pregnancy rates were when Hulka clips (Hulka-Clemens, Richard Wolf, Rosemont, Illinois) or Filshie clips (Coopersurgical, Lake Forest, California) were used as the mechanism of tubal occlusion and if bilateral MTR was performed instead of unilateral. There was not a significant difference in the pregnancy rates of MTR (44.3%) vs. IVF (38%). However, there was a statistically significant difference in the live birth rate of MTR (19%) vs. IVF (31%) (p=0.007). The rates of ectopic pregnancy and SAB after MTR were 10% and 15.7%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

This study showed a significantly higher live birth rate when patients underwent IVF as compared to MTR in the first 12 months following an MTR procedure.

Для цитирования: Hirth Ronald, Zbella Edward, Sanchez Mark, Prieto Jose. Microtubal reanastomosis: success rates as compared to in vitro fertilization.. The Journal of reproductive medicine. 2010.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.