MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.ijporl.2009.02.020

Медицинская библиотека · International journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology · 2009

Gold laser adenoidectomy: long-term safety and efficacy results.

Ida Jonathan B, Worley N Knight, Amedee Ronald G

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVES

To report the long-term results of Gold laser adenoidectomy with pressure equalization tube (PET) placement by measuring the incidence of otorrhea and middle ear effusion after tube extrusion.

STUDY

DESIGN

A prospective study of 50 patients, ages 8-48 months, that underwent Gold laser adenoidectomy with PE tube placement in a pediatric outpatient setting.

METHODS

We previously reported the initial results at 4 months post-op of 50 patients treated for adenoid hypertrophy and chronic otitis media with effusion (COME). All patients were then evaluated at 8, 12, and 16 months post-operatively. The incidence of otorrhea, extrusion of the PE tubes, and middle ear status was recorded.

RESULTS

The incidence of otorrhea was 3/50 (6%) at 8 months, 0 (0%) at 12 months, and 2 (4%) at 16 months. At 16 months, the PE tubes had extruded in 29 (58%) and 28/29 (97%) of these had clear middle ears. Forty-nine patients (98%) overall had clear middle ears at the last exam. One patient required a second set of tubes.

CONCLUSION

The long-term results of Gold laser adenoidectomy with PE tube placement for adenoid hypertrophy and COME compare favorably with the initial report of the technique, as well as with other techniques as reported in other studies.

Для цитирования: Ida Jonathan B, Worley N Knight, Amedee Ronald G. Gold laser adenoidectomy: long-term safety and efficacy results.. International journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology. 2009. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2009.02.020.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.