Journal of clinical anesthesia · 2007
Interpleural versus epidural analgesia with ropivacaine for postthoracotomy pain and respiratory function.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Yildirim Vedat, Akay Hakki Tankut, Bingol Hakan, Bolcal Cengiz, Oz Kursad, Kaya Erkan, Demirkilic Ufuk, Tatar Harun
Аннотация
STUDY OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of interpleural analgesia (IP) on postthoracotomy pain and respiratory function as an alternative to thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA).
DESIGN: Prospective, randomized study.
SETTING: Tertiary-care military hospital.
PATIENTS: Sixty young patients scheduled for elective thoracic surgery (correction of aorta coarctation and patent ductus arteriosus).
INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomized into two groups to receive either IP or TEA for postthoracotomy pain management.
MEASUREMENTS: Patients in the IP group (n = 30) had a catheter inserted between the parietal and visceral pleura by a surgeon, and 0.2% ropivacaine was given through this catheter. In the TEA group, ropivacaine was administered through a thoracic epidural catheter. The impact of both methods on pain control, respiratory function, and pulmonary complications was analyzed and compared.
MAIN RESULTS: The frequency of atelectasis and pleural effusion was also significantly high in the IP group (P < 0.01). Respiratory function and postoperative pain scores were better in the TEA group (P < 0.01). Arterial blood gas analysis on the fifth postoperative day was significantly better in the TEA group.
CONCLUSION: Thoracic epidural analgesia has more beneficial effects on respiratory function and postoperative pain after thoracotomy than does IP.
DESIGN: Prospective, randomized study.
SETTING: Tertiary-care military hospital.
PATIENTS: Sixty young patients scheduled for elective thoracic surgery (correction of aorta coarctation and patent ductus arteriosus).
INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomized into two groups to receive either IP or TEA for postthoracotomy pain management.
MEASUREMENTS: Patients in the IP group (n = 30) had a catheter inserted between the parietal and visceral pleura by a surgeon, and 0.2% ropivacaine was given through this catheter. In the TEA group, ropivacaine was administered through a thoracic epidural catheter. The impact of both methods on pain control, respiratory function, and pulmonary complications was analyzed and compared.
MAIN RESULTS: The frequency of atelectasis and pleural effusion was also significantly high in the IP group (P < 0.01). Respiratory function and postoperative pain scores were better in the TEA group (P < 0.01). Arterial blood gas analysis on the fifth postoperative day was significantly better in the TEA group.
CONCLUSION: Thoracic epidural analgesia has more beneficial effects on respiratory function and postoperative pain after thoracotomy than does IP.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
AdultAmidesAnalgesiaAnalgesia, EpiduralAnesthetics, LocalAortic CoarctationBlood Gas AnalysisDuctus Arteriosus, PatentFemaleHospitals, MilitaryHumansInjectionsMalePain MeasurementPostoperative PainPleuraPleural EffusionProspective StudiesPulmonary AtelectasisRespiratory Function TestsRopivacaineThoracotomy