Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica · 1984
Evaluation of history and simple supine cystometry as a preoperative test in stress urinary incontinence.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Fall M, Erlandson B E, Pettersson S
Аннотация
In a follow-up study the accuracy of a simple preoperative screening including history, Bonney 's test and supine cystometry was evaluated in patients with stress urinary incontinence. Based upon preoperative history alone, the patients were divided into two different groups, pure stress incontinence, and mixed stress and urge incontinence. All patients accepted had a normal supine cystometry at the preoperative work-up. The results of the operation were good in pure stress incontinence. In patients with mixed stress and urge incontinence the results were unsatisfactory and most of them presented a variety of urodynamic abnormalities postoperatively. Thus, in patients with pure stress incontinence, acceptance for surgery may be based upon a careful history, a simple supine cystometry and Bonney 's test, but in patients with mixed stress and urge incontinence a comprehensive clinical and urodynamic evaluation is mandatory. It seems that combination of detrusor instability and a history of pronounced urgency preoperatively calls for other therapeutic alternatives than operation.