Infant Outcomes After Elective Early-Term Delivery Compared With Expectant Management.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the risk of neonatal morbidity and infant mortality between elective early-term deliveries and those expectantly managed and delivered at 39 weeks of gestation or greater.

METHODS

We conducted a population-based retrospective cohort study of 675,302 singleton infants born alive at 37-44 weeks of gestation from 2005 to 2009 in more than 125 birthing facilities in Florida. Data were collected from a validated, longitudinally linked maternal and infant database. The study population was categorized into exposure groups based on the timing and reason for delivery initiation-four subtypes of deliveries at 37-38 weeks of gestation and a comparison group of expectantly managed infants delivered at 39-40 weeks of gestation. Primary outcomes included neonatal respiratory morbidity, sepsis, feeding difficulties, admission to the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU), and infant mortality.

RESULTS

Neonatal outcome rates ranged from 6.0% for respiratory morbidities to 1.3% for both sepsis and feeding difficulties, and the infant mortality rate was 1.5 per 1,000 live births. When compared with infants expectantly managed and delivered at 39-40 weeks of gestation, those delivered after elective induction at 37-38 weeks of gestation did not have increased odds of neonatal respiratory morbidity, sepsis, or NICU admission but did experience slightly higher odds of feeding difficulty (odds ratio 1.18, 99% confidence interval 1.02-1.36). In contrast, infants delivered by elective cesarean at 37-38 weeks of gestation had 13-66% increased odds of adverse outcomes. Survival experiences were similar when comparing early inductions and early cesarean deliveries with the expectant management group.

CONCLUSION

The issues that surround the timing and reasons for delivery initiation are complicated and each pregnancy unique. This study cautions against a general avoidance of all elective early-term deliveries.