The Journal of heart and lung transplantation : the official publication of the International Society for Heart Transplantation · 2009
Efficacy of a new pulmonary cyclosporine a powder formulation for prevention of transplant rejection in rats.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Zijlstra Gerrit S, Wolting Joske, Prop Jochum, Petersen Arjen H, Hinrichs Wouter L J, Uges Donald R A, Kerstjens Huib A M, van der Bij Wim, Frijlink Henderik W
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: The aim of this pilot study was to determine the pharmacokinetics of cyclosporine A powder for inhalation (iCsA) and its rejection prevention efficacy in an experimental lung transplantation model in rats.
METHODS: Single-dose pharmacokinetics (10 mg/kg) of pulmonary and orally administered cyclosporine A was determined in whole blood and in lung and kidney tissue. The efficacy of iCsA (2.5 and 5 mg/kg) in inhibiting rejection was determined in an orthotopic left-lung transplantation rat model and compared with orally administered CsA (5 and 10 mg/kg). The ventilation score of lung allografts was assessed with roentgenograms. At Day 10 post-operatively, the rats were terminated and lungs were prepared for histologic analysis.
RESULTS: In the pharmacokinetics study, AUC(0-48) values in blood for iCsA and oral CsA were similar (47,790 +/- 1,739 and 46,987 +/- 2,439 ng h ml(-1), respectively). In contrast, iCsA levels in lung tissue were much higher than oral CsA levels (AUC: 9,152,977 +/- 698,920 vs 84,149 +/- 8,134 ng h g(-1), respectively), showing the effectiveness of the pulmonary administration. In the rejection study, non-treated animals showed complete rejection after 8 days according to roentgenography. Treatment with 5 mg/kg iCsA reduced rejection on Day 10, whereas the 2.5-mg/kg dose did not inhibit rejection. Oral CsA at 10 mg/kg reduced rejection, whereas the 5-mg/kg dose showed hardly any effect on rejection.
CONCLUSIONS: We found that iCsA is an effective immunosuppressive formulation, and may become a valuable asset for clinical use in combination with systemic immunosuppression.
METHODS: Single-dose pharmacokinetics (10 mg/kg) of pulmonary and orally administered cyclosporine A was determined in whole blood and in lung and kidney tissue. The efficacy of iCsA (2.5 and 5 mg/kg) in inhibiting rejection was determined in an orthotopic left-lung transplantation rat model and compared with orally administered CsA (5 and 10 mg/kg). The ventilation score of lung allografts was assessed with roentgenograms. At Day 10 post-operatively, the rats were terminated and lungs were prepared for histologic analysis.
RESULTS: In the pharmacokinetics study, AUC(0-48) values in blood for iCsA and oral CsA were similar (47,790 +/- 1,739 and 46,987 +/- 2,439 ng h ml(-1), respectively). In contrast, iCsA levels in lung tissue were much higher than oral CsA levels (AUC: 9,152,977 +/- 698,920 vs 84,149 +/- 8,134 ng h g(-1), respectively), showing the effectiveness of the pulmonary administration. In the rejection study, non-treated animals showed complete rejection after 8 days according to roentgenography. Treatment with 5 mg/kg iCsA reduced rejection on Day 10, whereas the 2.5-mg/kg dose did not inhibit rejection. Oral CsA at 10 mg/kg reduced rejection, whereas the 5-mg/kg dose showed hardly any effect on rejection.
CONCLUSIONS: We found that iCsA is an effective immunosuppressive formulation, and may become a valuable asset for clinical use in combination with systemic immunosuppression.