The Prostate · 2014
Low risk patients benefit from extreme anterior apical sampling on initial biopsy for prostate cancer diagnosis.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Elshafei Ahmed, Kartha Ganesh, Li Yonghong, S Moussa Ayman, Hatem Asmaa, Gao Tianming, Jones J Stephen
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: To assess the effect of additional extreme apical sampling on prostate cancer (PCa) detection and aggressiveness in patients with standard risk versus high risk of a positive biopsy.
METHODS: Three thousand fifty three men were reviewed from our institution review board approved prostate biopsy database. Two thousand five hundred and twenty one underwent biopsy with 12 cores while 532 underwent 14 core sampling (2 extra cores from the extreme anterior apex). Patients were stratified into one of two risk groups: (1) standard risk of PCa (elevated prostate specific antigen (PSA) < 10 ng/ml, normal digital rectal exam (DRE), and no lesions on transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)), and (2) higher risk of PCa (PSA > 10 ng/ml and/or abnormal DRE and/or lesion on TRUS). Prostate cancer detection and disease characteristics were compared between the biopsy schemes stratified by risk of a positive biopsy.
RESULTS: PCa detection with 14 core sampling was more likely in all patients (OR 1.339, 95% CL 1.070-1.676) and in men with standard risk (OR 1.334, 95% CL 1.007-1.769). A greater median number of positive cores (3 vs. 2) and a higher maximum cancer % per core (40% vs. 25%) were seen in the 14 core cohort when stratified to standard risk. Gleason ≥7 was more likely detected with 14 cores in the standard risk group (55.6% vs. 45.2%). Differences in PCa detection and Gleason ≥7 between biopsy techniques were not noted in the higher risk group.
CONCLUSION: Extreme apical sampling increases aggressive cancer detection on initial biopsy, especially in patients with standard risk of PCa.
METHODS: Three thousand fifty three men were reviewed from our institution review board approved prostate biopsy database. Two thousand five hundred and twenty one underwent biopsy with 12 cores while 532 underwent 14 core sampling (2 extra cores from the extreme anterior apex). Patients were stratified into one of two risk groups: (1) standard risk of PCa (elevated prostate specific antigen (PSA) < 10 ng/ml, normal digital rectal exam (DRE), and no lesions on transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)), and (2) higher risk of PCa (PSA > 10 ng/ml and/or abnormal DRE and/or lesion on TRUS). Prostate cancer detection and disease characteristics were compared between the biopsy schemes stratified by risk of a positive biopsy.
RESULTS: PCa detection with 14 core sampling was more likely in all patients (OR 1.339, 95% CL 1.070-1.676) and in men with standard risk (OR 1.334, 95% CL 1.007-1.769). A greater median number of positive cores (3 vs. 2) and a higher maximum cancer % per core (40% vs. 25%) were seen in the 14 core cohort when stratified to standard risk. Gleason ≥7 was more likely detected with 14 cores in the standard risk group (55.6% vs. 45.2%). Differences in PCa detection and Gleason ≥7 between biopsy techniques were not noted in the higher risk group.
CONCLUSION: Extreme apical sampling increases aggressive cancer detection on initial biopsy, especially in patients with standard risk of PCa.