Neurosurgery · 1997
The role of transvenous embolization in the treatment of intracranial dural arteriovenous fistulas.
Клинический случайСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Roy D, Raymond J
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the role of transvenous embolization in the treatment of intracranial dural arteriovenous fistulas (DAVFs), including its efficacy and safety.
METHODS: We retrospectively studied the charts of 24 patients (21 women and 3 men) treated for an intracranial DAVF since 1990 in whom a transvenous approach was attempted either alone (16 patients) or in combination with arterial embolization (8 patients). There were 12 cavernous sinus, 9 transverse-sigmoid sinus, 2 inferior petrosal sinus, and 1 intradiploic fistulas. Three fistulas were Type I, 12 were Type IIa, and 9 were Type IIa+b, according to the revised Djindjian's classification. Transvenous embolic agents included coils (17 patients), detachable balloons (6 patients), bucrylate (2 patients), and silk sutures (1 patient).
RESULTS: Anatomic cure was proven in 21 patients (87.5%). Clinical cure was obtained in 23 cases (96%), as follows: 15 patients with a single transvenous approach, 6 with a combined arteriovenous approach, and 2 with an arterial approach after failure of venous access. There was one persistent cavernous fistula despite coil packing of the cavernous sinus. Complications were as follows: five transient and one permanent sixth nerve palsies in cavernous DAVFs, two transient labyrinthic dysfunctions in transverse sinus DAVFs, and one subarachnoid hemorrhage without sequelae.
CONCLUSION: Transvenous embolization is a useful and safe approach in the management of intracranial DAVFs.
METHODS: We retrospectively studied the charts of 24 patients (21 women and 3 men) treated for an intracranial DAVF since 1990 in whom a transvenous approach was attempted either alone (16 patients) or in combination with arterial embolization (8 patients). There were 12 cavernous sinus, 9 transverse-sigmoid sinus, 2 inferior petrosal sinus, and 1 intradiploic fistulas. Three fistulas were Type I, 12 were Type IIa, and 9 were Type IIa+b, according to the revised Djindjian's classification. Transvenous embolic agents included coils (17 patients), detachable balloons (6 patients), bucrylate (2 patients), and silk sutures (1 patient).
RESULTS: Anatomic cure was proven in 21 patients (87.5%). Clinical cure was obtained in 23 cases (96%), as follows: 15 patients with a single transvenous approach, 6 with a combined arteriovenous approach, and 2 with an arterial approach after failure of venous access. There was one persistent cavernous fistula despite coil packing of the cavernous sinus. Complications were as follows: five transient and one permanent sixth nerve palsies in cavernous DAVFs, two transient labyrinthic dysfunctions in transverse sinus DAVFs, and one subarachnoid hemorrhage without sequelae.
CONCLUSION: Transvenous embolization is a useful and safe approach in the management of intracranial DAVFs.