Multiple diagnostic task performance in CT examination of the chest.
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES
In three experiments, we studied the detection of multiple abnormality types using the satisfaction of search (SOS) paradigm, the provision of a computer-aided detection (CAD) of pulmonary nodules and a focused nodule detection task.
METHODS
51 chest CT examinations (24 that demonstrated subtle pulmonary nodules and 27 that demonstrated no pulmonary nodules) were read by 15 radiology residents and fellows under two experimental conditions: (1) when there were no other abnormalities present except test abnormalities in the exams (non-SOS condition), and (2) when other abnormalities were present in the exams (SOS condition). Trials from the two conditions were intermixed. Readers were invited to return for two sessions: one in which the SOS condition was repeated with a simulated CAD; another in which only the non-SOS condition was presented. Detection accuracy was measured using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis.
RESULTS
An SOS effect (reduced detection accuracy for the test nodules in the presence of the diverse added abnormalities) was not found. Average accuracy was much higher when the CAD prompt was provided, without cost in the detection of the added abnormalities. Accuracy for detecting nodules appearing without intermixed SOS trials was also substantially improved.
CONCLUSIONS
CT interpretation was highly task dependent. Nodule detection was poor in the general search task. Therefore, CAD may offer a greater performance improvement than demonstrated in experiments assessing CAD using focused search. The absence of SOS may be due to limited nodule detection even without other abnormalities. Advances in knowledge CAD prompts of nodules increase the detection accuracy of nodules and decrease the time to detection-without impairing the detection accuracy-of non-nodule abnormalities.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.