Journal of computer-aided molecular design · 2025
3CLpro of SARS-CoV-2 as a new target for bufadienolides: in silico and in vitro study.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Kayumov Muzaffar, Razzokov Jamoliddin, Makhkamov Mukhriddin, Radjabov Murodjon, Mukhamedov Nurkhodja, Khakimov Makhmudjon, Asrorov Akmal M, Khasanov Okhunjon, Yashinov Ansor, Tashmukhamedov Mugrajitdin, Wali Ahmidin, Yili Abulimiti, Mirzaakhmedov Sharafitdin
Аннотация
The rapid spread of SARS-CoV-2 and its widespread public health implications have highlighted the urgent need for effective antiviral therapies. A promising strategy is to investigate natural compounds that may inhibit the key viral targets. In this work, we demonstrated the anti-SARS-CoV-2 activity of six bufadienolides, including bufalin (A), arenobufagin (B), gamabufotalin (C), telocinobufagin (D), marinobufagin (E), and bufarenogin (F) from the venom of the Central Asian green toad, Bufo viridis. Molecular docking assays revealed that all A-F bufadienolides bind to key residues (Thr26, His41, Met49, Met161, and Gln189) in the catalytic pocket of 3-chymotrypsin-like cysteine protease (3CLpro), an essential enzyme for viral replication and polyprotein processing. The stability of the protein-ligand complexes was then tested using molecular dynamics (MD) simulations, while the binding free energies were estimated using the umbrella sampling (US) technique. Compounds A (-49.8 ± 1.0 kJ/mol), C (-45.9 ± 1.8 kJ/mol), E (-45.6 ± 1.1 kJ/mol), and F (-45.8 ± 1.9 kJ/mol) had significantly higher binding affinities than compounds B (-14.6 ± 1.1 kJ/mol) and D (-10.3 ± 1.9 kJ/mol). In vitro enzymatic assays also confirmed these results, demonstrating that A and C exhibited potent inhibitory activity against 3CLpro with IC50 values of 1.37 µM and 2 µM, respectively, compared to the other bufadienolides; however, they were less active than the positive control GC376 (IC50 = 0.27 µM). The experimental results are consistent with the computational observations. In silico ADME profiling also revealed good pharmacokinetic properties, indicating that bufadienolides A-F are lead compounds for further antiviral drug development. Taken together, our results support the hypothesis that bufadienolides are SARS-CoV-2 3CLpro inhibitors and elucidate their mechanism of action, thereby laying the foundation for potential therapeutic advances against COVID-19.