Heart (British Cardiac Society) · 2025
Non-malignant gynaecological disease and risk of cardiovascular or cerebrovascular disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
СтатьяСистематический обзорМетаанализНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Colombo Giorgia Elisabeth, Mahamat-Saleh Yahya, Armour Mike, Madan Kedar, Sabag Angelo, Kvaskoff Marina, Missmer Stacey A, Condous George, Pathan Faraz, Leonardi Mathew
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of death globally. Non-malignant gynaecological diseases (NMGD) significantly affect patient health and well-being and may be associated with cardiovascular or cerebrovascular disease (C/CVD).
METHODS: Seven databases were searched for relevant studies up to 21 April 2024. Observational studies reporting risk estimates and 95% CIs for the association between NMGD and C/CVD were included. Data were extracted by two independent reviewers. Random effects models were used to calculate summary relative risk (SRR) with 95% CI. Composite C/CVD outcome was defined as a combination of ischaemic heart disease, cerebrovascular disease, heart failure, and peripheral vascular disease. The ROBINS-I tool defined study quality and risk of bias.
RESULTS: We screened 6639 studies, of which 59 were eligible for full-text review and 28 were included in our analysis, comprising a total of 3 271 242 individuals. The majority (53.5%) of the studies were scored as having a 'serious'/'critical' risk of bias. Overall, individuals with an NMGD had a significantly greater risk of composite C/CVD with low heterogeneity among contributing studies (SRR 1.28, 95% CI 1.20 to 1.37; n=16 studies, I2=65.3%), ischaemic heart disease (SRR 1.41, 95% CI 1.31 to 1.51; n=21 studies, I2=73.7%), and cerebrovascular disease (SRR 1.33, 95% CI 1.18 to 1.51; n=16 studies, I2=91.5%). In NMGD-specific analyses, the risk of C/CVD and its components was greater among those with a history of endometriosis or polycystic ovary syndrome.
CONCLUSIONS: We found an overall association between NMGD and C/CVD across all studies. However, estimates from individual studies varied substantially.
METHODS: Seven databases were searched for relevant studies up to 21 April 2024. Observational studies reporting risk estimates and 95% CIs for the association between NMGD and C/CVD were included. Data were extracted by two independent reviewers. Random effects models were used to calculate summary relative risk (SRR) with 95% CI. Composite C/CVD outcome was defined as a combination of ischaemic heart disease, cerebrovascular disease, heart failure, and peripheral vascular disease. The ROBINS-I tool defined study quality and risk of bias.
RESULTS: We screened 6639 studies, of which 59 were eligible for full-text review and 28 were included in our analysis, comprising a total of 3 271 242 individuals. The majority (53.5%) of the studies were scored as having a 'serious'/'critical' risk of bias. Overall, individuals with an NMGD had a significantly greater risk of composite C/CVD with low heterogeneity among contributing studies (SRR 1.28, 95% CI 1.20 to 1.37; n=16 studies, I2=65.3%), ischaemic heart disease (SRR 1.41, 95% CI 1.31 to 1.51; n=21 studies, I2=73.7%), and cerebrovascular disease (SRR 1.33, 95% CI 1.18 to 1.51; n=16 studies, I2=91.5%). In NMGD-specific analyses, the risk of C/CVD and its components was greater among those with a history of endometriosis or polycystic ovary syndrome.
CONCLUSIONS: We found an overall association between NMGD and C/CVD across all studies. However, estimates from individual studies varied substantially.