Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography · 2025
Mechanical Adaptation of the Right Ventricle to Secondary Tricuspid Regurgitation and Its Association With Patient Outcomes.
СтатьяНаблюдательное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Ladányi Zsuzsanna, Lakatos Bálint Károly, Clement Alexandra, Tomaselli Michele, Fábián Alexandra, Radu Noela, Turschl Tímea Katalin, Ferencz Andrea, Merkely Béla, Surkova Elena, Kovács Attila, Muraru Denisa, Badano Luigi P
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Data regarding right ventricular (RV) mechanical adaptation to secondary tricuspid regurgitation (STR) are scarce.
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to investigate changes in RV contraction pattern in patients with different degrees of STR severity and etiologies and their association with outcomes.
METHODS: A total of 205 patients with STR (60% women; mean age, 77 ± 12 years) were enrolled in a single-center prospective observational study. Three-dimensional echocardiography was used to measure RV ejection fraction (RVEF); the absolute contributions of the longitudinal component of RVEF (LEF), the radial component of RVEF (REF), and the anteroposterior component of RVEF (AEF); and their relative contributions by indexing to global RVEF (LEF/RVEF, REF/RVEF, and AEF/RVEF, respectively). Patients were followed for a median of 9 months. The primary outcome was heart failure hospitalization or all-cause death.
RESULTS: Patients with different degrees of STR severity did not differ in terms of RVEF (mild vs moderate vs severe: 50 ± 11% vs 49 ± 9% vs 50 ± 10%, respectively, P = .085). However, LEF/RVEF was significantly lower in patients with severe STR (0.39 ± 0.08 vs 0.39 ± 0.09 vs 0.35 ± 0.10, respectively, P = .049). Patients with ventricular STR had lower global RVEF (48 ± 10% vs 53 ± 8%, P = .001), LEF (18 ± 6% vs 20 ± 5%, P = .043), REF (23 ± 9% vs 28 ± 8%, P = .002), and REF/RVEF (0.48 ± 0.012 vs 0.52 ± 0.09, P = .040) than patients with atrial STR. In a multivariable Cox regression model, REF/RVEF was a significant and independent predictor of outcomes in the entire cohort (hazard ratio, 0.980 [95% CI, 0.961-1.000] per 0.01-unit change, P = .047), whereas global RVEF was not.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients with STR demonstrate significant functional RV remodeling. Patients with severe STR show a significant decrease in RV longitudinal shortening. Apart from STR severity, STR etiology also influences the RV contraction pattern, which was associated with outcomes in our cohort.
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to investigate changes in RV contraction pattern in patients with different degrees of STR severity and etiologies and their association with outcomes.
METHODS: A total of 205 patients with STR (60% women; mean age, 77 ± 12 years) were enrolled in a single-center prospective observational study. Three-dimensional echocardiography was used to measure RV ejection fraction (RVEF); the absolute contributions of the longitudinal component of RVEF (LEF), the radial component of RVEF (REF), and the anteroposterior component of RVEF (AEF); and their relative contributions by indexing to global RVEF (LEF/RVEF, REF/RVEF, and AEF/RVEF, respectively). Patients were followed for a median of 9 months. The primary outcome was heart failure hospitalization or all-cause death.
RESULTS: Patients with different degrees of STR severity did not differ in terms of RVEF (mild vs moderate vs severe: 50 ± 11% vs 49 ± 9% vs 50 ± 10%, respectively, P = .085). However, LEF/RVEF was significantly lower in patients with severe STR (0.39 ± 0.08 vs 0.39 ± 0.09 vs 0.35 ± 0.10, respectively, P = .049). Patients with ventricular STR had lower global RVEF (48 ± 10% vs 53 ± 8%, P = .001), LEF (18 ± 6% vs 20 ± 5%, P = .043), REF (23 ± 9% vs 28 ± 8%, P = .002), and REF/RVEF (0.48 ± 0.012 vs 0.52 ± 0.09, P = .040) than patients with atrial STR. In a multivariable Cox regression model, REF/RVEF was a significant and independent predictor of outcomes in the entire cohort (hazard ratio, 0.980 [95% CI, 0.961-1.000] per 0.01-unit change, P = .047), whereas global RVEF was not.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients with STR demonstrate significant functional RV remodeling. Patients with severe STR show a significant decrease in RV longitudinal shortening. Apart from STR severity, STR etiology also influences the RV contraction pattern, which was associated with outcomes in our cohort.