Chest · 2001
Analysis of inspiratory flow shapes in patients with partial upper-airway obstruction during sleep.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Aittokallio T, Saaresranta T, Polo-Kantola P, Nevalainen O, Polo O
Аннотация
STUDY OBJECTIVE: To study the spectrum of inspiratory flow signal shapes in patients with partial upper airway obstruction during sleep.
DESIGN: We identified seven different inspiratory flow shapes and determined their frequencies in two groups of patients (10 postmenopausal women and 19 men after surgical treatment for sleep apnea) and in 9 control subjects.
SETTING: Sleep research unit, Department of Physiology, University of Turku, Finland.
MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Nasal flow was recorded with nasal prongs. The shape analyses were performed with an automated attribute grammar recognizer. The inspiratory flow-shape distributions differed significantly between patients and control subjects. The flow shapes were also different between postmenopausal women and men after uvulopalatopharyngoplasty.
CONCLUSIONS: The differences in the inspiratory flow-shape distributions between the control subjects and the two patient groups suggest that the upper airways behave differently in the three study groups. Automated inspiratory flow-shape analysis seems to be a promising tool to distinguish patient groups with different upper airway function to be treated with different treatment alternatives. The physiologic correlates of each flow-shape class remain to be elucidated.
DESIGN: We identified seven different inspiratory flow shapes and determined their frequencies in two groups of patients (10 postmenopausal women and 19 men after surgical treatment for sleep apnea) and in 9 control subjects.
SETTING: Sleep research unit, Department of Physiology, University of Turku, Finland.
MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Nasal flow was recorded with nasal prongs. The shape analyses were performed with an automated attribute grammar recognizer. The inspiratory flow-shape distributions differed significantly between patients and control subjects. The flow shapes were also different between postmenopausal women and men after uvulopalatopharyngoplasty.
CONCLUSIONS: The differences in the inspiratory flow-shape distributions between the control subjects and the two patient groups suggest that the upper airways behave differently in the three study groups. Automated inspiratory flow-shape analysis seems to be a promising tool to distinguish patient groups with different upper airway function to be treated with different treatment alternatives. The physiologic correlates of each flow-shape class remain to be elucidated.